Universal Trading and Investment Co. v. Dugsbery, Inc et al

Filing 66

ORDER 64 Stipulation, 55 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(2); and Def. Lazarenko's Motion to Quash Service of Process Pursuant to Federaul Rules of Civil Proced ure 12(B)(4) and (5) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(2); and Def. Lazarenko's Motion to Quash Service of Process Pursuant to Federaul Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(4) and (5).Response to 1st Amended Complaint 12/15/2008 Responses due by 1/6/2009. Replies due by 1/9/2009. Motion Hearing set for 1/16/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/12/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2008)

1 2 3 4 5

DORON WEINBERG (SBN 46131) NINA WILDER (SBN 100474) LISA A. D'ORAZIO (SBN 252834) WEINBERG & WILDER 523 Octavia Street San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants PAVLO I. LAZARENKO and DUGSBERY, INC.

6 7 8 9 IN RE UNIVERSAL TRADING & 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) INVESTMENT COMPANY, a ) Massachusetts Corporation, ) ) ) Judgment Creditor ) ) REGISTERED JUDGMENT FROM ) ANOTHER DISTRICT ) ___________________________________ ) ) UNIVERSAL TRADING & INVESTMENT) ) Co., ) Plaintiff and Judgment Creditor ) ) vs. ) ) DUGSBERY, INC.; ) PAVLO I. LAZARENKO; ) LADY LAKE INVESTMENT, CORP.; ) ORBY INTERNATIONAL, LTD.; ) UNITED ENERGY SYSTEMS OF ) UKRAINE, PFG; ) TRUSTEES FOR PAVLO I. LAZARENKO ) and DOES 1 to 100, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Nos. CV 08-3632 CRB STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION FILE RESPONSE TO AMENDED COMPLAINT; PROPOSED ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COURT: 8, 19th Floor JUDGE: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

IT IS HEREBY AGREED BY THE PARTIES, through their undersigned attorneys, that the date for Defendants response is extended to Monday December 15, 2008. The time for filing Plaintiff's Opposition is extended to January 6, 2009. The time for filing Defendant's
Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response to First Amended Complaint; Proposed Order (Nos. CV-08-3632 CRB)

1

1 2 3 4

Reply is January 9, 2009. The hearing date of January 16, 2009, shall remain the same. Respectfully Submitted,

Dated: December 11, 2008 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

/s/ Nina Wilder By:________________________ NINA WILDER Attorney for Defendants /s/ George Lambert By:__________________________ GEORGE LAMBERT JOHN ASPELIN Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response to First Amended Complaint; Proposed Order (Nos. CV-08-3632 CRB)

Pursuant to the above stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the time for Defendants to respond to the First Amended Complaint is extended for a period of four (4) days so that the answer or response may be filed by Monday, December 15, 2008. The time for filing Plaintiff's Opposition is extended to January 6, 2009. Defendant's Reply shall be filed by January 9, 2009. The hearing shall remain on January 16, 2009.

DATE: Decembr 12, 2008

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

2

A

C

LI

FO

harles Judge C

R. Brey

er

R NIA

________________________________ HONORABLE CHARLESERED R. BREYER RD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE S SO O TI

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

I

NO

RT

H