Harlick v. Blue Shield of California Group Health Plan

Filing 42

STIPULATION AND ORDER continuing hearings on motions for summary judgment from 1/8/10 to 2/19/10. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 9/10/09. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. CV 08 3651 SC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JEANENE HARLICK, Plaintiff, vs. BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA GROUP HEALTH PLAN and PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION & MANUFACTURING, INC. GROUP HEALTH PLAN, Defendants. Case No. CV-08-3651-SC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT New Hearing Date: Date: February 19, 2010 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Jeanene Harlick ("Plaintiff") and defendants California Physicians' Service, dba Blue Shield of California ("Blue Shield") and the Pacific Construction & Manufacturing, Inc. Group Health Plan (the "Plan"), through their respective counsel of record as follows: WHEREAS, at the June 26, 2009 status conference, the Court ordered that the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment (the "Motions") be heard at 10:00 a.m. on January 8, 2010; WHEREAS, counsel for Blue Shield anticipates being engaged in a jury trial in the matter of Anwar Soliman v. Del Taco, Inc. (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 07-CC-03162) between December 14 and December 28, 2009; WHEREAS, the current schedule would require Blue Shield to file its opposition to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment by December 18, 2009 and its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment by December 25, 2009; WHEREAS, Plaintiff and the Plan do not oppose continuing the hearings on the Motions to February 19, 2010; and WHEREAS, the requested continuance will only move the hearings back by six weeks, NOW, THEREFORE, and based upon the above recitals, it is hereby agreed and stipulated by the parties hereto, through their respective attorneys of record, that: /// /// /// 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. CV 08 3651 SC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. The parties' cross-motions for summary judgment shall be continued at 10:00 a.m. on February 19, 2010. IT IS SO STIPULATED. KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP Dated: September 9, 2009 By: s/ Lisa S. Kantor Lisa S. Kantor Attorneys for Plaintiff JEANENE HARLICK MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP Dated: September 9, 2009 By: s/ Adam Pines Adam Pines Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS' SERVICE, dba BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA TRUCKER HUSS Dated: September 9, 2009 By: s/ Robert F. Schwartz Robert F. Schwartz Attorneys for Defendant PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION & MANUFACTURING, INC. GROUP HEALTH PLAN ORDER It is so ordered. Dated: S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 9/10/09 UNIT ED S United States District Court Judge ti Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding ER C signatures, Adam Pines hereby attests that concurrenceNin the filing of this F D IS T IC T O R document has been obtained. 41426238.1 A 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. CV 08 3651 SC LI FO Judge S amuel C on R NIA IT IS S O ORD ERED NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?