United States Of America et al v. Padua

Filing 23

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND SCHEDULING MARCH 13, 2009 HEARING ON PETITION TO ENFORCE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS. No later than February 18, 2009, respondent may file and serve a response to the petition. No later than February 27, 2009, petitioners may file and serve any reply thereto. The Court shall conduct a hearing on the petition on March 13, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 29, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FUKEKILA MERRIDA, Revenue Officer, Petitioners v. THEODORE PADUA, Respondent / No. C-08-3714 MMC ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND SCHEDULING MARCH 13, 2009 HEARING ON PETITION TO ENFORCE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS United States District Court Before the Court is petitioners' Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summons, filed August 4, 2008.1 Having read and considered the petition, the Court hereby sets the following briefing schedule and hearing date: 1. No later than February 18, 2009, respondent Theodore Padua ("Padua") may file and serve a response to the petition. 2. No later than February 27, 2009, petitioners may file and serve any reply thereto. 3. The Court shall conduct a hearing on the petition on March 13, 2009, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 7, 19th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. All parties are ordered to appear in person at such hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 29, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge The above-titled action was reassigned to the undersigned on January 23, 2009.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?