United States Of America et al v. Padua

Filing 28

ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FILED MARCH 30, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 31, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In his filing, respondent misidentifies the petitioners as "The State of California Fictitious Foreign State." The actual names of the petitioners are set forth in the above caption. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FUKEKILA MERRIDA, Revenue Officer, Petitioners v. THEODORE PADUA, Respondent / No. C-08-3714 MMC ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FILED MARCH 30, 2010 On August 4, 2008, petitioners filed a Verified Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summonses, which petition the Court granted by order filed March 6, 2009. Now before the Court is respondent's "Administrative Notice; in the Nature of Writ of Coram Nobis & a Demand for Dismissal or State the Proper Jurisdiction," filed March 30, 2010, which filing, according to respondent, is brought pursuant to Rule 4(j) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 Rule 4(j) sets forth the manner in which a foreign state, a state, or a local government must be served with process. See Fed. R. Civ. 4(j). Because respondent is an individual, Rule 4(j) is wholly inapplicable to him, and respondent fails to show how he is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 entitled to relief under Rule 4(j). Further, to the extent the instant filing is construed as a motion for reconsideration of the Court's order of March 6, 2009, respondent also fails to make any showing supporting his entitlement to such relief; specifically, respondent fails to identify any cognizable basis for reconsideration. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Accordingly, respondent's motion is hereby DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 31, 2010 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?