Kaufman v. City of San Francisco et al
Filing
99
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7-9(d). Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on November 13, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2009)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On October 27, 2009, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's October 19, 2009 Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. On November 10, 2009, Defendants filed an objection to Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, arguing that Plaintiff failed to comply with Civil Local Rule 7-9(a), which requires a party to seek leave to file a motion for reconsideration before noticing a motion for reconsideration. On November 10, 2009, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to Have His Motion for Reconsideration Deemed Filed and Set for Hearing. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9(d), the Court orders a response to be filed no later than December 10, 2009. No hearing will be held on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave. The December 1, 2009 hearing date for Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration is vacated. If the Court grants leave to file a motion for reconsideration, the Court will set another briefing schedule and hearing date for that motion. The pretrial conference and trial dates are also vacated. A further case management v. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants. / BOB KAUFMAN, Plaintiff, No. C-08-03755 EDL ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7-9(d) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
conference will be held promptly to set new pretrial conference and trial dates once the Court rules on the Motion for Leave and the Motion for Reconsideration, if any. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 13, 2009 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
