Henson v. Camellia Carriers
Filing
21
ORDER. Signed by Judge James Larson on 5/6/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2009)
Case 3:08-cv-03757-JL
Document 19
Filed 05/05/2009
Page 1 of 2
BANNING MICKLOW & BULL LLP Edward M. Bull III, SBN 141996 2 Eugene A. Brodsky, SBN 36691 384 Embarcadero West, Suite 200 3 Oakland, California 94106 Telephone: (510) 268-6180 4 Facsimile: (510) 268-6181
1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Attorneys for Plaintiff Georgina Henson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
GEORGINA HENSON
) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) ) CAMELLIA CARRIERS, and DOES 1 ) through 20, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________ )
CASE NO.: 08-02375 JL STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING DIVERSITY JURISDICTION
Plaintiff Georgina Henson ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Camellia Container Carrier S.A.("CAMELLIA") hereby submit the following Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Diversity Jurisdiction as follows: WHEREAS when Plaintiff filed this action she failed to mention diversity as a basis for jurisdiction (though complete diversity existed and such facts were alleged); IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and REQUESTED THAT THE COURT ORDER: That diversity jurisdiction exists in this case and that the Plaintiff's Complaint
1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE DIVERSITY CASE NO.: 08-0237 JL
Case 3:08-cv-03757-JL
Document 19
Filed 05/05/2009
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
be deemed to be amended to reflect such bases of jurisdiction herein. SO STIPULATED. DATED: May 4, 2009 BANNING MICKLOW & BULL LLP By /s/ Edward M. Bull III Edward M. Bull III Eugene A. Brodsky Attorneys for Plaintiff Georgina Henson DATED: May 4, 2009 EMARD DANOFF PORT TAMULSKI & PAETZOLD LLP By /S/ Andrew I. Port Attorneys for Defendant CAMELLI CONTAINER CARRIER S.A. ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties and given the allegations in the Plaintiff's Complaint of complete diversity of citizenship, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Diversity Jurisdiction exists in this case and the Plaintiffs Complaint is hereby deemed to be amended to reflect such bases of jurisdiction. DATED:
May 6, 2009
Hon. James Larson
2 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE DIVERSITY
CASE NO.: 08-0237 JL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?