Technology Licensing Company, Inc. v. jWIN Electronics Corporation
ORDER re 12 Stipulation filed by jWIN Electronics Corporation. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/4/2009 02:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/20/09. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2009)
1 TECHNOLOGY LICENSING COMPANY INC. John W. Carpenter, Esq., State Bar No. 221708 2 33 ½ Los Pinos Nicasio, CA 94946 (415)577-0698 3 Telephone: Facsimile: (866)410-6248 firstname.lastname@example.org 4 Email: 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Technology Licensing Company Inc. 6 7 HANDAL & ASSOCIATES Attorneys at Law 8 Anton N. Handal, Esq., State Bar No. 113812 Gabriel G. Hedrick Esq.,State Bar No. 220649 9 PamelardC. Chalk, Esq., State Bar No. 216411 1200 3 Avenue, Suite 1321 10 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 544-6400 (619) 696-0323 11 Facsimile: Email: email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org 12 email@example.com 13 Attorneys for Defendant, jWin Electronics 14 15 16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 5:08-cv-03802-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Judge: Honorable Judge Richard Seeborg ____________________
17 TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CO. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. JWIN ELECTRONICS CORP., ET AL. Defendant. Plaintiff,
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties herein, through their respective counsel of record, as follows:
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
WHEREAS, the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter was set for
2 November 26, 2008; 3 WHEREAS, the Court continued said Initial Case Management Conference to
4 January 28, 2009 pursuant to the stipulation of the parties; 5 WHEREAS, the parties have been discussing settlement and have exchanged drafts
6 of settlement agreements; 7 8 WHEREAS, the parties believe that they are close to settling this matter; WHEREAS, the parties agree that they need further time to finalize the terms of the
9 settlement agreement; 10 WHEREAS, the parties are hopeful that they will be able to resolve this matter
11 without the need for the Court's involvement; 12 WHEREAS, such a resolution would be in the interest of both parties as their legal
13 fees would be reduced; 14 WHEREAS, the parties are requesting only a short one (1) week continuance of the
15 Case Management Conference; 16 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that it would be in the best interest of the
17 parties to seek a continuance of the Initial Case Management Conference to February 4, 2009 or to 18 another date thereafter as the Court's calendar permits; 19 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT the initial case
20 management conference in this matter shall be continued to February 4, 2009, or whatever date 21 thereafter the Court sets. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement not less than 22 ten (10) calendar days before the date for which the conference is set. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1 2 3 4 5 6
Respectfully submitted, DATED: January 16, 2009 TECHNOLOGY LICENSING COMPANY
By /s/John W. Carpenter John W. Carpenter. Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff HANDAL & ASSOCIATES
7 DATED: January 16, 2009 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDERED. January 20 Dated _____________, 2009
By /s/Gabriel G. Hedrick Anton N. Handal, Esq. Gabriel G. Hedrick, Esq. Pamela C. Chalk, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant jWin ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO
The Honorable Richard Seeborg United States Magistrate ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE I, Gabriel G. Hedrick, attest that signatory John Carpenter has read and approved the STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE and consents to its filing in this action.
/s/Gabriel G. Hedrick Gabriel G. Hedrick, Esq.
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?