Technology Licensing Company, Inc. v. America Action, Inc.

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER: Case Management Conference reset for 2/23/2009 04:00 PM; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 1/29/2009. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 John W. Carpenter, Esq. (Bar No. 221708) Technology Licensing Company Inc. 33 Los Pinos Nicasio, CA 94946 Telephone: (415) 240-4700 Facsimile: (415) 240-4771 Email: johnpatentlaw@iqmail.net Attorney for Plaintiff Technology Licensing Company, Inc. James Cai (Bar No. 200189) Schein & Cai LLP 111 W. St. John Street Suite 1250 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 436-0789 Facsimile: (408) 436-0758 Email: jcai@sacattorneys.com Attorneys for Defendant America Action, Inc. Kao Lu (admitted pro hac vice) Lu & Associates, P.C. 1425 E. Darby Road Havertown, Pa 19083 USA Telephone: (610) 446-2563 Facsimile: (610) 446-8841 Email: kaohlu@lu-associates.com Attorneys for Defendant America Action, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Technology Licensing Company v. America Action, Inc. Page 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Technology Licensing Company, Inc., Plaintiff, v. AMERICA ACTION, INC., Defendant, And Related Actions Case No.: 3:08-cv-03803 MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Judge: Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties herein, through their respective counsel of record, as follows: WHEREAS, the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter is currently continued to January 26, 2009 as stipulated by Plaintiff and Defendant with the Court approval; WHEREAS, certain third party customer has expressed reservation as to the tentative settlement terms negotiated by Plaintiff and Defendant; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that it would be in the best interest of the parties to seek a further continuance of the Initial Case Management Conference to February 23, 2009 at 4:00 p.m. or to another date thereafter the Court's calendar permits in order to finalize the settlement; ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT the status conference in this matter be continued to February 23, 2009, or whatever date thereafter the Court's calendar permits. By: /s/ John W. Carpenter Technology Licensing Company v. America Action, Inc. Page 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN W. CARPENTER Attorney for Plaintiff Technology Licensing Company, Inc. By: /s/ James Cai Schein & Cai LLP Attorney for Defendant America Action, Inc. By: /s/ Kao Lu Lu & Associates, P.C. Attorney for Defendant America Action, Inc. Technology Licensing Company v. America Action, Inc. Page 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 3 4 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 The Honorable MarilynORDPatel D Hall ERE United States District Judge ari Judge M lyn H. P UNIT ED S 5 January 29 Dated _____________, 2009 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O atel 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ER N F D IS T IC T O R Technology Licensing Company v. America Action, Inc. Page 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE A C LI FO 9 R NIA IT IS S O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?