Technology Licensing Company, Inc. v. America Action, Inc.

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE; Each side to bear costs; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 3/9/2009. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2009)

|--

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I I 10 11
\c) \n o\
:il

o H N W. CARPENTER Q2r708)
e c h n o l o g yLicensing CompanyInc.

3 YzLos Piffos, ica s i o ,CA94946 [phone] hone: acsimile l -866-4rc-6248 :

Kao Lu L u & Associates, P.C. 1425E. DarbyRoad H av er t ow nPa.19083 , USA Phone: 6lA-446-2563 F a l < :610-446-8841 kaohlu@ associates. lucom

ttorneys Plaintiff and Counterclaim for
Defendant Technologt Licensing Company,Inc,

A t t o r n e y sfor Defendantand Counterclaimant A m e r i c a Action Inc

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
v.

a 88 E,i e9Y i3 az

:

IN THE UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT F OR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF'CALIFORNIA SAIYFRANCISCO DIVISION

U
F
F]

T e c h n o l o ryLicensingCompany,Inc., Plaintiff andCounterclaim Defendant

Case No. CV 08 3803 MHP ST I PU LAT I O N OF'DISMISSAL ANI) ORDER TITEREON IPROPOSEDI

Ame ri c aAction, Inc. DefendanandCounterclaimant t

lationof Dismissal N o . C 08-03803 MHP

Technology Lioensing v. America Co Action Inc

1

Fursualrt a confidentialsettlem*ntsrssffientffrd rel*asen I$ HEREBY t{} IT TIPULATED by andbetween PlaintiffTECr{NOLOSY LICEhI$INS C*MPANY, INC. andS*fsndnrrtAI!{ERICA ACTI*H, m{C. f'AAo'3-thraught}reirc*xnsel *f r*s*rd, t}tet ah*ve-*aBtisned *etiorq :irmluding clairflsandcsunterslnirnsn andf,r*reby di*rnissed all b* is tth prejudice Bur to Fsdesal Ruls of Civil Frscedure 4t{n}{U" Hach,party shallbesrli* cwn

2 3 4 5

s
7

s
fi 10 11
\p w {n qf
(I\

1n
1S 14 1# 1S, 17 1fi 1S ?fi 21

fqfi tr;t JH
#u
rff i6 Fd 6f

H

t

SE

w, cARpHNTfiR {?217fi8* lngy Linsnsing Lrc. #*r*rp*r:y 33 14 Fifrn*, Lor Nica*inCA p4p46 , Fhons{415}577-fi698 : Fa*sirniler $} 276-q8.57 {41 Hnrai:lj nhn wcsrpqnte cslrl rlaw. ffij AI larn#ys Ftaint **d tsantercIaim iff for frefendnnTe t chnalagy mws C*mpany Li ing

2r"
2# g4 2# 2B 27

* , / i l**x{l*
ilu & As*peisteso F.C, l4?5 fi. Ssr,byRcad Haysrtstryn, 19S*3U$A Pa ,#;563 Phsne: 6l S-44S F n x : SIS-44S-S841

?s

Att*rnxys ##fr'n#wrct #*ant*r*laimanl *nd f,#r Ameri*sAsti$nInt

*f fi'isminsnl H*, ff S&-03&03 lr"li.IP

Techn*logy.Limngln#$ v, ArneriefiA*tisn Xne g

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I I 10 11
$\ o
z
d

ORDER

TO P U R S U A N T STIPULATION AND UPONGOODCAUSESHOWN,IT IS SO ERED.

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

March 9

2008

Hon. Marilyn H. Patel

t|r o

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ER

N

E3
H

s8
art

F D IS T IC T O R

Qe-

s6

sz

U
F<
F]

of Dismissal No. C 08-03803 MIIP

Technology Lioensing v. AmericaAction Inc Co

A

C

LI

FO

l UnitedStates arilyn Judgee District H. Pat ge M Jud

R NIA

O OR IT IS S

DERED

RT U O

NO

RT

H