Technology Licensing Company, Inc. v. America Action, Inc.

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE; Each side to bear costs; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 3/9/2009. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2009)

Download PDF
|-- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I I 10 11 \c) \n o\ :il o H N W. CARPENTER Q2r708) e c h n o l o g yLicensing CompanyInc. 3 YzLos Piffos, ica s i o ,CA94946 (415)577-0698 hone: acsimile l -866-4rc-6248 : Kao Lu L u & Associates, P.C. 1425E. DarbyRoad H av er t ow nPa.19083 , USA Phone: 6lA-446-2563 F a l < :610-446-8841 kaohlu@ associates. lucom ttorneys Plaintiff and Counterclaim for Defendant Technologt Licensing Company,Inc, A t t o r n e y sfor Defendantand Counterclaimant A m e r i c a Action Inc 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. a 88 E,i e9Y i3 az : IN THE UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT F OR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF'CALIFORNIA SAIYFRANCISCO DIVISION U F F] T e c h n o l o ryLicensingCompany,Inc., Plaintiff andCounterclaim Defendant Case No. CV 08 3803 MHP ST I PU LAT I O N OF'DISMISSAL ANI) ORDER TITEREON IPROPOSEDI Ame ri c aAction, Inc. DefendanandCounterclaimant t lationof Dismissal N o . C 08-03803 MHP Technology Lioensing v. America Co Action Inc 1 Fursualrt a confidentialsettlem*ntsrssffientffrd rel*asen I$ HEREBY t{} IT TIPULATED by andbetween PlaintiffTECr{NOLOSY LICEhI$INS C*MPANY, INC. andS*fsndnrrtAI!{ERICA ACTI*H, m{C. f'AAo'3-thraught}reirc*xnsel *f r*s*rd, t}tet ah*ve-*aBtisned *etiorq :irmluding clairflsandcsunterslnirnsn andf,r*reby di*rnissed all b* is tth prejudice Bur to Fsdesal Ruls of Civil Frscedure 4t{n}{U" Hach,party shallbesrli* cwn 2 3 4 5 s 7 s fi 10 11 \p w {n qf (I\ 1n 1S 14 1# 1S, 17 1fi 1S ?fi 21 fqfi tr;t JH #u rff i6 Fd 6f H t SE w, cARpHNTfiR {?217fi8* lngy Linsnsing Lrc. #*r*rp*r:y 33 14 Fifrn*, Lor Nica*inCA p4p46 , Fhons{415}577-fi698 : Fa*sirniler $} 276-q8.57 {41 Hnrai:lj nhn wcsrpqnte cslrl rlaw. ffij AI larn#ys Ftaint **d tsantercIaim iff for frefendnnTe t chnalagy mws C*mpany Li ing 2r" 2# g4 2# 2B 27 * , / i l**x{l* ilu & As*peisteso F.C, l4?5 fi. Ssr,byRcad Haysrtstryn, 19S*3U$A Pa ,#;563 Phsne: 6l S-44S F n x : SIS-44S-S841 ?s Att*rnxys ##fr'n#wrct #*ant*r*laimanl *nd f,#r Ameri*sAsti$nInt *f fi'isminsnl H*, ff S&-03&03 lr"li.IP Techn*logy.Limngln#$ v, ArneriefiA*tisn Xne g 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I I 10 11 $\ o z d ORDER TO P U R S U A N T STIPULATION AND UPONGOODCAUSESHOWN,IT IS SO ERED. UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA March 9 2008 Hon. Marilyn H. Patel t|r o 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ER N E3 H s8 art F D IS T IC T O R Qe- s6 sz U F< F] of Dismissal No. C 08-03803 MIIP Technology Lioensing v. AmericaAction Inc Co A C LI FO l UnitedStates arilyn Judgee District H. Pat ge M Jud R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?