Glen Ellen Capital Company, Inc. v. Cross Country International Corp.

Filing 18

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 GLEN ELLEN CAPITAL COMPANY, INC., a California Corporation, doing business as COWBOY HIDEAWAY, Plaintiff, v. CROSS COUNTRY INTERNATIONAL CORP., doing business as EQUESTRIAN VACATIONS, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. / No. C 08-03824 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE On October 24, 2008, plaintiff submitted a letter indicating that, on a conference call with the mediator, defendant represented that defendant will file a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition in New York in the very near future. Plaintiff requested a thirty day continuance of the deadline for initial disclosures, which is currently October 30, and the deadline to answer the cross complaint. Plaintiff indicates that the mediator continued mediation discussions until November 11, 2008, to see if the petition is filed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff's representation that defendant had represented to it that defendant will file a bankruptcy petition sometime in the future does not constitute good cause to continue this case. The request contains no representation by defendant that defendant intends to file a bankruptcy petition nor any explanation of the likelihood and precise timing of such a filing. The request for a continuance is therefore DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 27, 2008 WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?