Gillis et al v. City & County of San Francisco et al

Filing 108

ORDER RE: 84 , 78 HEARINGS ON MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/19/10.(rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2010)

Download PDF
Gillis et al v. City & County of San Francisco et al Doc. 108 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 **E-filed 10/19/2010** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), defendants' motion for a protective order presently set for hearing on October 21, 2010 is hereby submitted for decision without oral argument. Defendants' motion for summary judgment was also set for hearing on October 21, 2010, but the parties were directed to meet and confer regarding stipulating to continue it in light of the issues regarding how much, if any, further discovery should go forward. Although the parties have failed to file any stipulation, good cause appears to vacate the hearing date. Rescheduling the motion for v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al. Defendants. ____________________________________/ CHARLES GILLIS, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 08-3871 RS ORDER RE HEARINGS ON MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 summary judgment will be discussed at the upcoming case management conference on October 28, 2010.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10/19/10 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 A prior order misstated the date of the case management conference as October 21, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?