ExperExchange, Inc v. Doculex, Inc et al

Filing 78

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOLLOWING IN-PERSON MEET & CONFER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE re 63 MOTION to Compel Further Responses to Document Reqeusts and Interrogatories; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declaration of David Swift in Support The reof filed by David Bailey, Doculex, Inc, David Griffiths, Terry Morgan, Jim Grebey, Carl Strang, 67 MOTION to Compel Responses filed by ExperExchange, Inc. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 9/2/9. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Daniel R. Richardson, Esq., SBN 165601 Richardson Intellectual Property Law, Prof. Corp. 870 Market Street, Suite 615 San Francisco, CA 94102 [phone] Fax: [phone] Kinsella Weitzman Iser Kump & Aldisert, LLP Dale F. Kinsella (SBN 063370) Jeremiah Reynolds (SBN 223554) David W. Swift (SBN 235033) 808 Wilshire Blvd. 3rd Floor Santa Monica, CA 90401 [phone] Fax: [phone] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) vs. ) ) ) DOCULEX, INC., a Florida corporation; ) CARL STRANG, an individual; TERRY MORGAN, an individual; DAVID BAILEY, ) an individual; JIM GREBEY, an individual; ) ) DAVID GRIFFITH, an individual, ) Defendants. ) ) ) _____________________________________ ) AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION EXPEREXCHANGE, INC. a California Corporation, DBA: EXPERVISION, Plaintiff, Case No.: CV-08-3875 JCS

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOLLOWING IN-PERSON MEET & CONFER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE

Plaintiff ExperExchange, Inc. and Defendants DOCULEX, INC., CARL STRANG, TERRY MORGAN, DAVID BAILEY, JIM GREBEY, DAVID GRIFFITH hereby stipulate to provide the following supplemental responses and/or production: //
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOLLOWING IN-PERSON MEET & CONFER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Defendant Demands: Document Requests 14 & 15, 30 (includes Interrogatory No. 19). Plaintiff agrees to produce attachments 4 & 5 for every RSLA entered into between 1999 and August of 2008. Plaintiff may redact customer identifying information. Document Request 19. Plaintiff agrees to supplement its response to RFP # 19 by producing the Bo Yan Interview Summary. Document Request 31 - 37. Plaintiff agrees to supplement its response by providing all non-privileged documents related to Plaintiff's RSLA disputes with the following companies: REBUS, Inc.; PSIGEN, Inc., Atalasoft, Inc., Top Imaging Systems, Inc., HanWang, Inc. Interrogatories 4, 5, 7 ­ 12: Plaintiff agrees to supplement its responses within 10 days following Defendant's supplemental production as set forth, infra. Interrogatory 18: Plaintiff agrees to provide supplemental responses by September 18, 2009. Plaintiff Demands: Document Demands to Doculex 98 Defendant agrees to supplement its response by producing internal communications regarding the software engineering design and development of any software products from the trade name list by September 18, 2009, to the extent any exist, and have not already been
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOLLOWING IN-PERSON MEET & CONFER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

produced. Document Demands to Doculex 96 and 108 Defendants agree that if the Court denies Defendant's summary adjudication motion as to Discovery Cracker, Defendants will supplement their production by providing Discovery Cracker Division sales documents within 10 days after the Court ruling. Document Demands to Doculex (100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105) Defendant agrees to supplement its production regarding customer downloads for RTK software upgrades for products on the trade name list by September 18, 2009, if any documents exist. Document Demands to Doculex (92) Defendant agrees to supplement its production by providing any earlier versions of the program known as Discovery Cracker (prior to version 5.0) in its custody and control, by September 18, 2009. Document Demands to Individual Defendants Document Demands to David Bailey (10): Defendant agrees to supplement his production regarding marketing plans for products on the trade name list by September 18, 2009, if any documents exist. Richardson Intellectual Property Law, Prof. Corp.

/s/ Daniel R. Richardson _____________________________________ Daniel R. Richardson, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOLLOWING IN-PERSON MEET & CONFER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Kinsella Weitzman Iser Kump & Aldisert, LLP

/s/ David W. Swift _______________________________________ David W. Swift, Esq. Attorney for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED

Date: September 2, 2009

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOLLOWING IN-PERSON MEET & CONFER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE 4

A

C

LI

FO

________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Speroh C. Spero sep Judge Jo

R NIA

RT U O

NO

RT

H