BMG Music et al v. Doe

Filing 19

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 1/13/2009. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP Dawniell Zavala (State Bar No. 253130) 560 Mission Street, 25th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 Telephone: (415) 268-2000 Facsimile: (415) 268-1999 Email: dawniell.zavala@hro.com Attorney for Plaintiffs BMG MUSIC; SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT; UMG RECORDINGS, INC.; VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC.; WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC.; and ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION BMG MUSIC, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. John Doe, Defendant. Case No.: 3:08-cv-03991 MHP Honorable Marilyn H. Patel NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Case No. 3:08-cv-03991 MHP #41978 v1 saf 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 By /s/ Dawniell Zavala Dawniell Zavala Attorney for Plaintiffs BMG MUSIC; SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT; UMG RECORDINGS, INC.; VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC.; WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC.; and ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION Dated: January 12, 2009 HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs BMG MUSIC, et al., by and through their attorneys, voluntarily dismiss without prejudice their copyright infringement claims against Defendant John Doe, also identified as ID # 161809670 with IP address 171.66.131.20 2008-0308 17:34:13 EST, each party to bear its/his or her own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close this case. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Case No. 3:08-cv-03991 MHP #41978 V1 SAF UNIT ED S 17 S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R 1 A C LI FO arilyn Judge M H. Pate l R NIA OO IT IS S RDERE D RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?