Terumo Cardiovascular Systems Corporation v. Maquet Cardiovascular, L.L.C.

Filing 18

ORDER for extension of time re 13 Stipulation filed by Terumo Cardiovascular Systems Corporation. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/14/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Mathias W. Samuel (pro hac vice to be filed, MN Bar No. 272164) (samuel@fr.com) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 60 South Sixth Street 3300 RBC Plaza Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: 612-335-5070 Facsimile: 612-288-9696 John D. Garretson (pro hac vice to be filed, NY Bar No. 2595395) (garretson@fr.com) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Citigroup Center - 52nd Floor 153 East 53rd Street New York, NY 10022-4611 Telephone: 212-765-5070 Facsimile: 212-258-2291 Shelley K. Mack (CA Bar No. 209596) (mack@fr.com) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: 650-839-5070 Facsimile: 650-839-5071 Attorneys for Plaintiff TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR L.L.C. Case No. 3:08-cv-04003-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME Upon the Stipulation of the parties that Terumo shall have until and including December 18, 2008 in which to file an answer, motion or any other responsive pleading to the Answer and Counterclaims filed by Maquet, 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME Case No. 3:08-cv-04003-EMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: November 3, 2008 UNIT ED ER N D IS T IC T R OF 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME Case No. 3:08-cv-04003-EMC A C LI 50617421.doc FO harles R Judge C . Breyer R NIA ED ORDER OEdward M. Chen MagistrateIJudge IT S S S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?