Chandler v. City of Emeryville et al

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 Stipulation filed by Edward Suen, City of Emeryville. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/17/09. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:08-cv-04010-EMC Document26 Filed07/15/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Kathleen Maylin (State Bar No. 155371) JACKSON LEWIS LLP 199 Fremont Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 394-9400 Facsimile: (415) 394-9401 E-mail: maylink@jacksonlewis.com Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF EMERYVILLE and EDMUND SUEN Pamela Y. Price (State Bar No. 107713) Eun Grace Chung (State Bar No. 259766) PRICE AND ASSOCIATES A Professional Law Corporation 1611 Telegraph Avenue, Suite 1450 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 452-0292 Facsimile: (510) 452-5625 E-mail: pypesq@aol.com E-mail: gchung@pypesq.com Attorneys for Plaintiff CRAIG CHANDLER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CRAIG CHANDLER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF EMERYVILLE, EDMUND SUEN IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 15, INCLUSIVE, Defendants. Case No. C08-4010 EMC JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PRODUCTION OF DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Complaint Filed: 08/21/08 Amended Complaint Filed: 09/26/08 Plaintiff CRAIG CHANDLER ("Plaintiff") and Defendant CITY OF EMERYVILLE ("Defendant") enter into the following Joint Stipulation Regarding the Production of Deposition Transcript as follows: WHEREAS, in 2008, former City of Emeryville employee Reza Bonabi had his 1 Case No. C08-4010 EMC STIP. RE PRODUCTION OF DEPO. TRANSCRIPT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case3:08-cv-04010-EMC Document26 Filed07/15/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 deposition taken in workers' compensation proceedings unrelated to this action. At one point during Plaintiff's employment, Mr. Bonabi, as Information Systems Manager with the City, supervised Plaintiff; WHEREAS, Plaintiff believes that he is entitled to review Mr. Bonabi's workers' compensation deposition transcripts in the course of discovery in this action; WHEREAS, Defendants believe that they are unable to produce Mr. Bonabi's deposition testimony without a Court order as its production would be a violation of Mr. Bonabi's personnel privacy rights; WHEREAS, if the transcript is ordered to be produced, Plaintiff agrees to limit further disclosure per the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order; THEREFORE, in light of the foregoing, the parties hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Defendant agrees that, if this Court orders the production of Mr. Bonabi's workers' compensation transcript, they will produce said transcripts to Plaintiff within five (5) business days pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order to be executed by the parties. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the proposed Stipulated Protective Order and [Proposed] Order. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: July 14, 2009 By: JACKSON LEWIS LLP /s/ Kathleen Maylin Kathleen Maylin Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF EMERYVILLE and EDMUND SUEN Dated: July 14, 2009 By: PRICE AND ASSOCIATES /s/ Pamela Price Pamela Y. Price Eun Grace Chung Attorneys for Plaintiff CRAIG CHANDLER 2 Case No. C08-4010 EMC STIP. RE PRODUCTION OF DEPO. TRANSCRIPT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case3:08-cv-04010-EMC Document26 Filed07/15/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [PROPOSED] ORDER Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the Court orders as follows: 1. Defendant shall produce Mr. Bonabi's workers' compensation transcript pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order to be executed by the parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNIT ED 8 Dated: July 17, 2009 EDWARD M. CHEN United States DistrictEREDMagistrate Judge ORD Court M. Che n S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O ER N F D IS T IC T O R 3 Case No. C08-4010 EMC STIP. RE PRODUCTION OF DEPO. TRANSCRIPT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER A C LI FO dward Judge E R NIA IT IS S O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?