Estate of Christopher Burgess et al v. Liles et al

Filing 16

ORDER granting substitution. Signed by Judge Illston on 12/12/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2008)

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-04029-SI Document 15 Filed 12/11/2008 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ERIC R. MAIER (SBN 182808) LOUIS E. SHOCH (SBN 205557) MAIER SHOCH LLP 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 5880 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 489-4778 Facsimile: (213) 489-4798 BRIAN E. CLAYPOOL (SBN 134674) THE CLAYPOOL LAW FIRM 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 5880 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 488-2042 Facsimile: (626) 796-9951 Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Estate of CHRISTOPHER BURGESS, MARGORIE BURGESS, as Guardian of LEE ALLEN CONOBOY, and CASEY LEE BURGESS Plaintiffs, v. OFFICER TERRY LILES, CHIEF MURL HARPHAM, PROBATION OFFICER STEVE SCHAENING, PROBATION OFFICER PETRINA FENNELL, PROBATION OFFICER ANDREW McLAUGHLIN, DEPUTY SHERIFF JON SYLVIA, THE CITY OF EUREKA, THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF HUMBOLDT COUNTY PAUL V. GALLEGOS, THE HUMBOLDT COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, and VARIOUS DOES DEFENDANTS, 1 through X, inclusive, Defendants. Case No.: 08-CV-4029 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY 08-CV-4029 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY Case 3:08-cv-04029-SI Document 15 Filed 12/11/2008 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court hereby orders that Plaintiff Margorie Burgess's request to substitute attorneys Brian E. Claypool of the Claypool Law Firm and Eric R. Maier of Maier Shoch LLP as counsel of record for Margorie Burgess, who previously was acting in pro per, is hereby GRANTED. DATED: U.S. District Court Judge 08-CV-4029 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?