IO Group, Inc. v. Antelope Media, LLC

Filing 44

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF IO GROUP'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Plaintiff shall file the Second Amended Complaint no later than April 15, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 9, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

D. GILL SPERLEIN (172887) THE LAW FIRM OF D. GILL SPERLEIN 584 Castro Street, Suite 879 San Francisco, California 94114 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Attorney for Plaintiff IO GROUP, INC.

) IO GROUP, INC., a California corporation, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) ANTELOPE MEDIA, LLC, an Arizonian ) limited liability company, SUNRISE MEDIA, Ltd., a British Limited Company, ) ) MIKE HERMANN, a.k.a. MAIK ) HERRMANN, a resident of Germany; ) THORSTEN PALICKI, a resident of ) Germany; and DOES 1 through 9 inclusive, ) ) Defendants. )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CASE NO.: C-08-4050 (MMC) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF IO GROUP, INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT No Hearing

[PROPOSED] ORDER On April 3, 2009, Plaintiff filed its motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. Rule 15 Mandates that "[t]he court should freely give leave when justice so requires." Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 15(a)(2).

-1[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT C-08-4050 (MMC)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The Court having reviewed and considered the moving papers, thereto and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Plaintiff's motion is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file the Second Amended Complaint no later then

April 15, 2009 ___________________.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

April 9, 2009 Dated:____________________

______________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT C-08-4050 (MMC)