Cardenas et al v. City of Crescent City et al

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER: Status Conference continued to 9/14/2009 03:00 PM in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, San Francisco; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 8/24/2009. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BRIAN E. CLAYPOOL, Esq. SBN NO. 134674 THE CLAYPOOL LAW FIRM TH 1055 East Colorado Boulevard, 5 Floor Pasadena, California 91106 (626) 240-4616 - Telephone (626) 240-4617 - Facsimile becesq@aol.com DALE K. GALIPO, ESQ., SBN 144074 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO 21800 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 310 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone (818) 347-3333 Facsimile (818) 347-4118 dalekgalipo@yahoo.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MISTI CARDENAS; CARLOS CARDENAS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CRESCENT CITY; COUNTY OF DEL NORTE, CALIFORNIA, et al Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. CV 08-04053 MHP STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING TO THE COURT, TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THE ATTORNEYS 1 Stipulation to Continue Status Conference Hearing OF RECORD HEREIN: 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties by and through their 2 respective attorneys of record that the Status Conference in this matter, currently 3 scheduled for August 24, 2009 at 3:00 p.m. be continued to September 14, 2009 at 4 3:00 p.m. The parties are requesting a continuance of the status conference due to 5 plaintiff's counsel Dale K. Galipo unavailability due to scheduling conflict having 6 a dispositive motion hearing on the morning of August 24, 2009. Plaintiff's 7 counsel Brian E. Claypool is unavailable on another matter and not being able to 8 attend the status conference. Both defense counsel, John M. Vrieze for the County 9 of Del Norte and William D. Ayers for the City of Crescent City are on currently 10 on vacation up to and including August 24, 2009 11 12 /s/ 13 Dated: August 21, 2009 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _______________________________ BRIAN E. CLAYPOOL Attorney for Plaintiffs Dated: August 21 , 2009 /s/ ________________________________ JOHN M. VRIEZE Attorneys for Defendant County Del Norte /s/ Dated: August 21 , 2009 ________________________________ WILLIAM D. AYRES Attorneys for Defendant City of Crescent City 2 Stipulation to Continue Status Conference Hearing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BRIAN E. CLAYPOOL, Esq. SBN NO. 134674 THE CLAYPOOL LAW FIRM TH 1055 East Colorado Boulevard, 5 Floor Pasadena, California 91106 (626) 240-4616 - Telephone (626) 240-4617 - Facsimile becesq@aol.com DALE K. GALIPO, ESQ., SBN 144074 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO 21800 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 310 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone (818) 347-3333 Facsimile (818) 347-4118 dalekgalipo@yahoo.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MISTI CARDENAS; CARLOS CARDENAS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CRESCENT CITY; COUNTY OF DEL NORTE, CALIFORNIA, et al Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. CV 08-04053 MHP [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED based upon the 1 [Proposed] Order Re Stipulation to Continue Status Conference Hearing stipulation of the parties that the status conference currently scheduled for 1 August 24, 2009 be continued to September 14, 2009 at 3:00 p.m.. 2 3 4 8/24/2009 Dated: _________________ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ER N F D IS T IC T O R 2 [Proposed] Order Re Stipulation to Continue Status Conference Hearing A C LI FO Ju rilyn H dge Ma . Patel R NIA ER HONORABLE MARILYN EDPATEL O ORD H. T IS SCOURT JUDGE I U.S. DISTRICT NO UNIT ED 5 S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?