Barnes v. AT&T Pension Benefit Plan-NonBargained Program

Filing 287

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULING re 282 Proposed Order filed by Quiller Barnes. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/29/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 R. Joseph Barton, CA Bar No. 212340 Email: jbarton@cohenmilstein.com Bruce F. Rinaldi, CA Bar No. 55133 Email: brinaldi@cohenmilstein.com Robyn M. Swanson, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Email: rswanson@cohenmilstein.com COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL P LLC 1100 New York Avenue, N.W. West Tower, STE 500 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 Facsimile: (202) 408-4699 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff & the Class 8 9 10 11 Patrick W. Shea, Admitted Pro Hac Vice, NY Bar No. 4587176 Email: patrickshea@paulhastings.com PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 75 East 55th Street New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 318-6000 Facsimile: (212) 319-4090 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant [Additional counsel listed on the next page] 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 QUILLER BARNES, 19 Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 Case No. 08-04058 EMC JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULE AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN NONBARGAINED PROGRAM, 22 Defendant. 23 Judge Edward M. Chen 24 25 26 27 28 C OHEN , M ILSTEIN , S ELLERS & T OLL P.L.L.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1161879.1 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULE CASE NO. 08-04058 EMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 Michelle L. Roberts, CA Bar No. 239092 Email: mlr@ssrlawgroup.com Claire Kennedy-Wilkins, CA Bar No. 231897 Email: ckw@ssrlawgroup.com SPRINGER-SULLIVAN & ROBERTS LLP 410 – 12th Street, Suite 325 Oakland, CA 94607 Telephone: (510) 992-6130 Facsimile: (510) 280-7564 Attorneys for Plaintiff & the Class QUILLER BARNES 7 8 9 10 11 Stephen H. Harris, CA Bar No. 184608 Email: stephenharris@paulhastings.com M’Alyssa C. Mecenas, CA Bar No. 272075 Email: malyssamecenas@paulhastings.com PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 515 South Flower Street, 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 683- 6000 Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 12 13 14 15 Regan A.W. Herald, CA Bar No. 251879 Email: reganherald@paulhastings.com PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 55 Second Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 856- 7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 16 17 Attorneys for Defendant AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN – NONBARGAINED PROGRAM 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1161879.1 1 C OHEN , M ILSTEIN , S ELLERS & T OLL PLLC JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULE CASE NO. 08-04058 EMC 1 2 Plaintiff Quiller Barnes and Defendant AT&T Pension Benefit Plan – NonBargained Program (collectively the “Parties”) through their respective counsel stipulate as follows: 3 WHEREAS, on July 25, 2011, the Court ordered that the parties submit a stipulation 4 regarding the new briefing schedule on the cross motions for summary judgment (to follow 5 shortly after completion of settlement conference.) (Dkt. No. 265); 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 WHEREAS, the Parties completed a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge MariaElena James on November 16, 2011 but were unable to settle the case (Dkt. No. 281); WHEREAS the Court also ordered the Parties to submit a Joint Stipulation setting forth a briefing schedule for summary judgment by no later than November 21, 2011 (Dkt. No. 277); WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred regarding the briefing schedule on cross motions for summary judgment; WHEREAS, the parties previously requested in their joint case management statement of 13 June 22, 2011 (Dkt. No. 258), that the Court increase the number of allowable pages in light of 14 the proposed consolidated briefing schedule to: 15 • 50 pages for Defendant's combined Cross-Motion and Opposition (the total 16 number of combined pages Defendant normally would have available under Civil Local Rules 7- 17 2(b) and 7-4(b) for both a Motion for Summary Judgment and an Opposition), and 18 • 40 pages for Plaintiff’s combined Opposition and Reply (the total number of 19 combined pages Plaintiff normally would have available under Civil Local Rule 7-4(b) for both 20 an Opposition and a Reply). 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES that the following summary judgment briefing schedule shall apply: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for summary judgment on the question of Plan interpretation and standard of review to be filed by no later than January 13, 2012; 24 25 2. Defendant’s combined Cross-Motion and Opposition to be filed by no later than February 3, 2012; 26 27 3. Plaintiff’s combined Opposition and Reply to be filed by no later than February 28, 2012; 28 C OHEN , M ILSTEIN , S ELLERS & T OLL P.L.L.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1161879.1 1 -1- JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULE CASE NO. 08-04058 EMC 1 4. Defendant’s Reply to be filed by no later than March 13, 2012; and 2 5. Hearing on Motions will be held on March 30, 2012. 3 6. The following page limitations shall apply for the parties combined briefing: 40 a. 50 pages for Defendant's combined Cross-Motion and Opposition, and 4 b. 40 pages for Plaintiff’s combined Opposition and Reply. 25 5 6 7 Dated: November 21, 2011 8 COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC By: /s/_________________________________ R. Joseph Barton Attorneys for Plaintiff & Class 9 10 11 Dated: November 21, 2011 PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP By: /s/_________________________________ Patrick W. Shea Attorneys for Defendant 12 13 14 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 20 DERED SO OR ED IT IS Hon. Edward M. Chen DIFI U.S. District Court Judge AS MO NO dward Judge E SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 21 RT 22 24 n M. Che E A H 23 R NIA Dated: FO 11/29/11 19 UNIT ED 18 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 17 (as modified above - Lines 4-6) LI 15 C RN I, Michelle L. Roberts, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has F been obtained from the other signatories on this document. D IS T IC T O R 25 26 /S/ 27 MICHELLE L. ROBERTS 28 1161879.1 1 C OHEN , M ILSTEIN , S ELLERS & T OLL PLLC -2- JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULE CASE NO. 08-04058 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?