Barnes v. AT&T Pension Benefit Plan-NonBargained Program
Filing
287
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULING re 282 Proposed Order filed by Quiller Barnes. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/29/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
R. Joseph Barton, CA Bar No. 212340
Email: jbarton@cohenmilstein.com
Bruce F. Rinaldi, CA Bar No. 55133
Email: brinaldi@cohenmilstein.com
Robyn M. Swanson, Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Email: rswanson@cohenmilstein.com
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL P LLC
1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
West Tower, STE 500
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone:
(202) 408-4600
Facsimile:
(202) 408-4699
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff & the Class
8
9
10
11
Patrick W. Shea, Admitted Pro Hac Vice, NY Bar No. 4587176
Email: patrickshea@paulhastings.com
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
75 East 55th Street
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: (212) 318-6000
Facsimile: (212) 319-4090
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant
[Additional counsel listed on the next page]
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
QUILLER BARNES,
19
Plaintiff,
20
v.
21
Case No. 08-04058 EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULE
AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN NONBARGAINED PROGRAM,
22
Defendant.
23
Judge Edward M. Chen
24
25
26
27
28
C OHEN , M ILSTEIN ,
S ELLERS & T OLL
P.L.L.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1161879.1 1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 08-04058 EMC
1
2
3
4
5
6
Michelle L. Roberts, CA Bar No. 239092
Email: mlr@ssrlawgroup.com
Claire Kennedy-Wilkins, CA Bar No. 231897
Email: ckw@ssrlawgroup.com
SPRINGER-SULLIVAN & ROBERTS LLP
410 – 12th Street, Suite 325
Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone: (510) 992-6130
Facsimile:
(510) 280-7564
Attorneys for Plaintiff & the Class
QUILLER BARNES
7
8
9
10
11
Stephen H. Harris, CA Bar No. 184608
Email: stephenharris@paulhastings.com
M’Alyssa C. Mecenas, CA Bar No. 272075
Email: malyssamecenas@paulhastings.com
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
515 South Flower Street, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (213) 683- 6000
Facsimile: (213) 627-0705
12
13
14
15
Regan A.W. Herald, CA Bar No. 251879
Email: reganherald@paulhastings.com
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
55 Second Street, 24th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 856- 7000
Facsimile: (415) 856-7100
16
17
Attorneys for Defendant
AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN – NONBARGAINED PROGRAM
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1161879.1 1
C OHEN , M ILSTEIN ,
S ELLERS & T OLL
PLLC
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 08-04058 EMC
1
2
Plaintiff Quiller Barnes and Defendant AT&T Pension Benefit Plan – NonBargained
Program (collectively the “Parties”) through their respective counsel stipulate as follows:
3
WHEREAS, on July 25, 2011, the Court ordered that the parties submit a stipulation
4
regarding the new briefing schedule on the cross motions for summary judgment (to follow
5
shortly after completion of settlement conference.) (Dkt. No. 265);
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
WHEREAS, the Parties completed a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge MariaElena James on November 16, 2011 but were unable to settle the case (Dkt. No. 281);
WHEREAS the Court also ordered the Parties to submit a Joint Stipulation setting forth a
briefing schedule for summary judgment by no later than November 21, 2011 (Dkt. No. 277);
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred regarding the briefing schedule on cross
motions for summary judgment;
WHEREAS, the parties previously requested in their joint case management statement of
13
June 22, 2011 (Dkt. No. 258), that the Court increase the number of allowable pages in light of
14
the proposed consolidated briefing schedule to:
15
•
50 pages for Defendant's combined Cross-Motion and Opposition (the total
16
number of combined pages Defendant normally would have available under Civil Local Rules 7-
17
2(b) and 7-4(b) for both a Motion for Summary Judgment and an Opposition), and
18
•
40 pages for Plaintiff’s combined Opposition and Reply (the total number of
19
combined pages Plaintiff normally would have available under Civil Local Rule 7-4(b) for both
20
an Opposition and a Reply).
21
22
23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES that the
following summary judgment briefing schedule shall apply:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion for summary judgment on the question of Plan interpretation and
standard of review to be filed by no later than January 13, 2012;
24
25
2. Defendant’s combined Cross-Motion and Opposition to be filed by no later than
February 3, 2012;
26
27
3. Plaintiff’s combined Opposition and Reply to be filed by no later than February 28,
2012;
28
C OHEN , M ILSTEIN ,
S ELLERS & T OLL
P.L.L.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1161879.1 1
-1-
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 08-04058 EMC
1
4. Defendant’s Reply to be filed by no later than March 13, 2012; and
2
5. Hearing on Motions will be held on March 30, 2012.
3
6. The following page limitations shall apply for the parties combined briefing:
40
a. 50 pages for Defendant's combined Cross-Motion and Opposition, and
4
b. 40 pages for Plaintiff’s combined Opposition and Reply.
25
5
6
7
Dated: November 21, 2011
8
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC
By: /s/_________________________________
R. Joseph Barton
Attorneys for Plaintiff & Class
9
10
11
Dated: November 21, 2011
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
By: /s/_________________________________
Patrick W. Shea
Attorneys for Defendant
12
13
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
20
DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
Hon. Edward M. Chen
DIFI
U.S. District Court Judge
AS MO
NO
dward
Judge E
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
21
RT
22
24
n
M. Che
E
A
H
23
R NIA
Dated:
FO
11/29/11
19
UNIT
ED
18
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
17
(as modified above - Lines 4-6)
LI
15
C
RN
I, Michelle L. Roberts, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has
F
been obtained from the other signatories on this document.
D IS T IC T O
R
25
26
/S/
27
MICHELLE L. ROBERTS
28
1161879.1 1
C OHEN , M ILSTEIN ,
S ELLERS & T OLL
PLLC
-2-
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 08-04058 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?