Barnes v. AT&T Pension Benefit Plan-NonBargained Program

Filing 350

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING TELEPHONIC CMC re 348 Proposed Order filed by Quiller Barnes Case Management Statement due by 5/9/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 5/16/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/1/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC R. Joseph Barton (CA State Bar No. 212340) Email: jbarton@cohenmilstein.com Bruce F. Rinaldi (CA State Bar No. 55133) Email: brinaldi@cohenmilstein.com 1100 New York Avenue, N.W. West Tower, STE 500 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 Facsimile: (202) 408-4699 Attorneys for Plaintiff & the Class 7 QUILLER BARNES 8 11 PAUL HASTINGS LLP Patrick W. Shea (NY State Bar No. 4587176), Pro Hac Vice Email: patrickshea@paulhastings.com 75 East 55th Street New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 318-6000 Facsimile: (212) 319-4090 12 Attorneys for Defendant 9 10 13 AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN – NONBARGAINED PROGRAM 14 [Additional counsel listed on next page] 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 QUILLER BARNES, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. 08-04058 EMC JOINT STIPULATION SCHEDULING TELEPHONIC CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN – NONBARGAINED PROGRAM, Defendant. 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 08-04058 EMC JOINT STIP. SCHEDULING TELEPHONIC CMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER 4 SPRINGER-SULLIVAN & ROBERTS LLP Michelle L. Roberts (CA State Bar No. 239092) Email: mlr@ssrlawgroup.com 410 – 12th Street, Suite 325 Oakland, CA 94607 Telephone: (510) 992-6130 Facsimile: (510) 280-7564 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 1 2 3 QUILLER BARNES 6 7 8 9 10 11 PAUL HASTINGS LLP Stephen H. Harris (CA State Bar No. 184608) Email: stephenharris@paulhastings.com M’Alyssa C. Mecenas (CA State Bar No. 272075) Email: malyssamecenas@paulhastings.com 515 South Flower Street, 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 683- 6000 Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 15 PAUL HASTINGS LLP Regan A.W. Herald (CA State Bar No. 251879) 875 15th Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 551- 1700 Facsimile: (202) 551-1705 Email: reganherald@paulhastings.com 16 Attorneys for Defendant 12 13 14 17 AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN – NONBARGAINED PROGRAM 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 08-04058 EMC -1- JOINT STIP. SCHEDULING TELEPHONIC CMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiff Quiller Barnes and Defendant AT&T Pension Benefit Plan – NonBargained 1 2 Program (collectively referred to as the “Parties”), acting through their respective counsel of record, 3 hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the Court set a telephonic case management conference in the above-captioned 4 5 matter for Thursday, March 14, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. (D.E. #329), which fell approximately three weeks 6 after the initial deadline for Class Members to intervene in the partial dismissal of claims; 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Parties’ Second Joint Statement, Stipulation, and [Proposed] 8 Order Regarding Issuance of Class Notice re Partial Dismissal of Claims, the Court extended the 9 deadline for Class Members Lester K. McClain and Robert Wiraatmadja to intervene to 45 days 10 following the re-issuance of the Class Notice (D.E. #339); WHEREAS, Class Counsel re-issued the Class Notice to Class Members Lester K. McClain 11 12 and Robert Wiraatmadja on Friday, February 22, 2013; WHEREAS, the new 45-day deadline for Class Members Lester K. McClain and Robert 13 14 Wiraatmadja to intervene is April 8, 2013; WHEREAS, the Parties believe that the primary purpose of the telephonic case management 15 16 conference is to permit the Parties the opportunity to inform the Court as to whether any Class 17 Member has sought to intervene and, if so, to discuss how such potential intervention will affect case 18 management; and 19 WHEREAS, the Parties believe that it is appropriate to reschedule the telephonic case 20 management conference to a date after the new deadline to intervene and the Parties therefore both 21 seek to reschedule the telephonic case management conference from March 14, 2013 to May 16, 22 2013. 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES: 24 The telephonic case management conference in the above-captioned matter may be rescheduled 25 from March 14, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. to May 16, 2013. 26 27 28 Case No. 08-04058 EMC -2- JOINT STIP. SCHEDULING TELEPHONIC CMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 DATED: March 1, 2013 2 /s/ Michelle L. Roberts MICHELLE L. ROBERTS Attorneys for Plaintiff Quiller Barnes 3 4 By: DATED: March 1, 2013 5 By: /s/ Stephen H. Harris STEPHEN H. HARRIS Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Pension Benefit Plan - NonBargained Program 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 08-04058 EMC -3- JOINT STIP. SCHEDULING TELEPHONIC CMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 1 2 I, Michelle L. Roberts, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been 3 obtained from the other signatory on this document. 4 DATED: March 1, 2013 By: /s/ Michelle L. Roberts MICHELLE L. ROBERTS 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 08-04058 EMC -4- JOINT STIP. SCHEDULING TELEPHONIC CMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the telephonic case 3 management conference in the above-captioned matter is hereby rescheduled from March 14, 2013 4 to May 16, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. The Court will call counsel. The Parties’ Joint Case Management 5 Statement is now due no later than May 9, 2013. 6 S DERED O OR IT IS S RT ER H 12 13 14 n M. Che FO dward Judge E NO 11 R NIA HON. EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Court LI 10 By: A 9 3/1 DATED: _________________, 2013 UNIT ED 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. N D IS T IC T R OF C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 08-04058 EMC -5- JOINT STIP. SCHEDULING TELEPHONIC CMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?