Haile v. Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital et al

Filing 191

ORDER DENYING 173 , 184 PLAINTIFF'S POST-TRIAL MOTIONS OF MARCH 9, 2010 AND APRIL 2, 2010; VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 14, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 For the Northern District of California 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 As defendant points out, the latter motion is noticed for hearing on April 30, 2010, and, consequently, does not comply with the Civil Local Rules of this District. See Civ. L.R. 7-2(a). The Court nonetheless has considered the motion. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TSEGAI HAILE, v. Plaintiff, No. 08-4149 MMC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S POSTTRIAL MOTIONS OF MARCH 9, 2010 AND APRIL 2, 2010; VACATING HEARING SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants. / Before the Court is plaintiff Tsegai Haile's "Motion for New Trial to Compel His Attorney's Obligation or Proceed in Pro Se & For Extension to Filing Notice of Appeal," filed March 9, 2010 and plaintiff's "Notice of Motion and Motion for Judgment," filed April 2, 2010.1 Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital has filed opposition, to which plaintiff has replied. Having read and considered the parties' respective written submissions, the Court finds the motions appropriate for consideration thereon, hereby VACATES the April 30, 2010 hearing, and, for the reasons stated by defendant in its opposition, hereby DENIES each such motion in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 14, 2010 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?