Wells v. Quest Diagnostic Benefit Plan
Filing
11
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 11/3/08. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2008)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111
RONALD K. ALBERTS (SBN 100017) TAD A. DEVLIN (SBN 190355) TAMAR KARAGUEZIAN (SBN 216233) GORDON & REES LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-5900 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 Attorneys for Defendants QUEST DIAGNOSTIC BENEFIT PLAN and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHANNON WELLS, Plaintiff, vs. QUEST DIAGNOSTIC BENEFIT PLAN, Defendant. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Real Party in Interest. ) CASE NO. C08-04155 SC ) ) STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL ) OF ACTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gordon & Rees LLP
TO THE COURT: The parties hereto, Plaintiff Shannon Wells, and Defendants, Quest Diagnostic Benefit Plan and Aetna Life Insurance Company, by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows: Whereas, Aetna Life Insurance Company has determined that Shannon K. Wells is disabled and eligible to receive monthly benefits effective September 17, 2007 and continuing through the present time, the parties stipulate as follows: -1-
STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL
Case No. C08-04155 SC
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111
1. Ms. Wells, through her counsel, shall negotiate directly with Quest Diagnostics for employer paid restoration of family medical benefits and life insurance, and for reimbursement of sums which she has paid to maintain medical and life insurance benefits since September 17, 2007; 2. Aetna Life Insurance Company will permit, on application of the employer, the restoration of family medical benefits, through the Plan in issue; and, 3. All other issues having been resolved, the parties agree that this case shall be dismissed with prejudice, provided that the Court will retain jurisdiction to reopen the case to enforce the provisions of paragraph 2. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: November 3, 2008
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gordon & Rees LLP
GORDON & REES LLP By_________________S/__________________ Ronald K. Alberts Tad A. Devlin Tamar Karaguezian Attorneys for Defendants QUEST DIAGNOSTIC BENEFIT PLAN and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
DATED: November 3, 2008
LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY
By_______________S/____________________ Laurence F. Padway Attorneys for Plaintiff SHANNON WELLS
AETNA/1053481/6091189v.1
STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL
-2-
Case No. C08-04155 SC
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHANNON WELLS, Plaintiff, vs. QUEST DIAGNOSTIC BENEFIT PLAN, Defendant. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Real Party in Interest. ) CASE NO. C08-04155 SC ) ) ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Gordon & Rees LLP
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the entire action is dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to the stipulation of counsel dated October 31, 2008. Dated: 11/3 , 2008
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
RT U O
UNIT ED
24 25 26 27 28
AETNA/1053481/6091232v.1
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
-1[Proposed] Order re Dismissal Case No. C08-04155 SC
A
C
LI
FO
a Judge S
muel Co
nti
R NIA
JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT
NO
IT IS S
O ORD
ERED
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?