Anderson v. American Airlines, Inc.

Filing 160

ORDER REGARDING APRIL 14 AFFIDAVIT re 159 Affidavit filed by Edward E. Anderson. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 14, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2011)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 8 9 No. C 08-04195 WHA EDWARD E. ANDERSON, ORDER REGARDING APRIL 14 AFFIDAVIT v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Defendant. / 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 On April 13, Judge Chesney issued an order denying plaintiff’s second motion for recusal 12 of the undersigned judge. The order noted that “such motion is procedurally defective in that it is 13 not supported by an affidavit.” In denying the motion, however, the order set “any procedural 14 defect aside” and found “no basis for the relief requested” in the record (Dkt. No. 158). 15 About an hour later, plaintiff filed an affidavit “in support of disqualification” of the 16 undersigned judge. The affidavit sets forth the same pattern of facts and arguments that was 17 referred to Judge Chesney as constituting a second motion for recusal. It does not present any 18 new substance (Dkt. No. 159). 19 If plaintiff’s recent submission was an attempt to cure the procedural defect of his second 20 motion for recusal, it is moot. The motion was denied on other, substantive, grounds. If 21 plaintiff’s recent submission was intended as a request for reconsideration of the order denying 22 his second motion for recusal, or if it was intended as a third motion for recusal, it is not in proper 23 form. Letters and affidavits are not the proper way to seek relief from the Court. No further 24 action will be taken on plaintiff’s April 13 affidavit. If plaintiff seeks further action from this 25 Court regarding the matters raised therein, then plaintiff should file a timely motion for relief in 26 proper form, pursuant to the applicable rules. 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 14, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?