Anderson v. American Airlines, Inc.
Filing
160
ORDER REGARDING APRIL 14 AFFIDAVIT re 159 Affidavit filed by Edward E. Anderson. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 14, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2011)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
9
No. C 08-04195 WHA
EDWARD E. ANDERSON,
ORDER REGARDING
APRIL 14 AFFIDAVIT
v.
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.,
Defendant.
/
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
On April 13, Judge Chesney issued an order denying plaintiff’s second motion for recusal
12
of the undersigned judge. The order noted that “such motion is procedurally defective in that it is
13
not supported by an affidavit.” In denying the motion, however, the order set “any procedural
14
defect aside” and found “no basis for the relief requested” in the record (Dkt. No. 158).
15
About an hour later, plaintiff filed an affidavit “in support of disqualification” of the
16
undersigned judge. The affidavit sets forth the same pattern of facts and arguments that was
17
referred to Judge Chesney as constituting a second motion for recusal. It does not present any
18
new substance (Dkt. No. 159).
19
If plaintiff’s recent submission was an attempt to cure the procedural defect of his second
20
motion for recusal, it is moot. The motion was denied on other, substantive, grounds. If
21
plaintiff’s recent submission was intended as a request for reconsideration of the order denying
22
his second motion for recusal, or if it was intended as a third motion for recusal, it is not in proper
23
form. Letters and affidavits are not the proper way to seek relief from the Court. No further
24
action will be taken on plaintiff’s April 13 affidavit. If plaintiff seeks further action from this
25
Court regarding the matters raised therein, then plaintiff should file a timely motion for relief in
26
proper form, pursuant to the applicable rules.
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 14, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?