Pollar et al v. County of Alameda et al

Filing 90

STIPULATION AND ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 2/23/2010 Re: Increased Page Limit for Plaintiffs' Opposition to County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. CSB#159747 DENNIS R. INGOLS, ESQ. CSB#236458 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. POWELL 925 West Hedding Street San José, California 95126 T: 408-553-0200 F: 408-553-0203 Attorneys for Plaintiffs DANIELLE POLLAR, SHALAWN POLLAR as Guardian Ad Litem for J.A., a minor IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANIELLE POLLAR, SHALAWN POLLAR as Guardian Ad Litem for J.A., a minor, Plaintiffs, vs. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, Mary Takeuchi, Dale Billiter, Michael Yee CITY OF HAYWARD, Sam Sander, Mike Edwards, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. _____ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 08-04196 BZ

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: INCREASED PAGE LIMIT FOR PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO COUNTY DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The parties hereto, by and through their respective counsel, do hereby stipulate and agree as set forth below and request this court order same: 1. Plaintiffs may file a brief up to 29 pages in Opposition to the County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment which is filed and currently pending. 2. County Defendants may file a Reply brief up to 4 pages longer than the default limit as

1 Stipulation and Order Pollar v. County of Alameda, et al. (Case No. 08-04196 BZ)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
1

provided for by the Local Rules.1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: 2/22/10 ___/S/ Robert R. Powell_______ ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiffs __ /S/ Rebecca Widen_________ REBECCA WIDEN, ESQ. Attorney for County of Alameda, and Individually Named Defendant Employees of the County of Alameda

Dated: 2/22/10

[PROPOSED] ORDER Based on the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties and orders as follows: 1. Plaintiffs may file a brief up to 29 pages in Opposition to the County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment which is filed and currently pending. 2. County Defendants may file a Reply brief up to 4 pages longer than the default limit as provided for by the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Date: 2/____/2010 _______________________________ JUDGE BERNARD ZIMMERMAN U.S.D.C NORTHERN DISTRICT CALIFORNIA ­ San Francisco

City Defendants' counsel, Patrick Co, was contacted by e-mail regarding this stipulation, mostly for posterity sake, as the requested relief does not effect his clients. He did not respond, so the stipulation was filed without his approval. Plaintiffs' counsel apologizes if the court disagrees with this approach. 2 Stipulation and Order Pollar v. County of Alameda, et al. (Case No. 08-04196 BZ)