Committee for Immigrant Rights of Sonoma County et al v. County of Sonoma et al

Filing 140

Scheduling ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 10/14/2009. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR IMMIGRANT RIGHTS OF SONOMA COUNTY, et al., Plaintiff(s), v. COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Before the court are two stipulations of the parties concerning the scheduling of the settlement conference, which the court approves, and the briefing of the anticipated motions to dismiss the second amended complaint, which the court approves in part. In the stipulation concerning the settlement conference, the parties refer to their proposed briefing schedule for the motions to dismiss which sets forth a date of January 2, 2010 for the filing of replies and February 3, 2010 for the hearing on the motions. However, the stipulation concerning the briefing of the motions to dismiss, sets forth a January 20, 2010 date for the replies and February 3, 2010 for the hearing. Given that January 2, 2010 is a Saturday, the court assumes the latter schedule is the one intended by the parties. The court notes that in recognition of the complexity of the complaint and the motions that will be filed, the parties have expanded threefold the amount of time for briefing, but have chosen not to similarly expand the amount of time that the court will have to prepare for the hearing after completion of briefing. Given that these motions will not be the only ones on the court's calendar, the court sua sponte continues the hearing date to February 17, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 14, 2009 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge No. C 08-4220 PJH SCHEDULING ORDER United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?