Committee for Immigrant Rights of Sonoma County et al v. County of Sonoma et al

Filing 173

ORDER RE: 169 GRANTING LEAVE TO SEEK RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 03/30/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 **E-filed 03/30/2010** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION COMMITTEE FOR IMMIGRANT RIGHTS OF SONOMA COUNTY, et al., v. Plaintiffs, No. C 08-4220 RS ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO SEEK RECONSIDERATION United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9, defendants County of Sonoma, Sheriff-Coroner William Cogbill and Deputy Sheriff Morris Eric Salkin (collectively, "County defendants") request leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court's Order re Motions to Dismiss, entered on March 10, 2010 (Docket No. 164).1 Without prejudice to the possibility of a subsequent conclusion that sufficient grounds for reconsideration do not exist, leave to file a motion for reconsideration is hereby granted. County defendants shall file their motion no later than April 1, 2010, with briefing The County defendants style their request as an "ex parte motion." Under Civil Local Rule 7-10, an ex parte motion is one filed without notice to opposing party, and is permissible only where authorized under the circumstances by a statute, Federal Rule, local rule, or Standing Order. The County defendants, however, e-filed their motion, with the result that it was automatically served on all parties who have appeared. The motion, therefore, was not made "ex parte" within the meaning of the Local Rules, despite its label. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 to proceed as provided in Civil Local Rule 7. All discovery as to County Defendants herein is hereby stayed pending further order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 03/30/2010 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?