Andreas v. Yates et al
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 19, 2008. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2008)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) WARDEN JAMES A. YATES, et ) al., ) ) Defendants. ______________________________ ) NICHOLAS DAVID ANDREAS,
No. C 08-4221 MMC (PR) ORDER OF TRANSFER
On September 8, 2008, plaintiff, a California prisoner incarcerated at Pleasant Valley State Prison ("PVSP") in Coalinga, California, and proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that prison officials at PVSP are violating his constitutional rights in a variety of ways. He seeks injunctive relief prohibiting the alleged unlawful actions. Venue may be raised by the court sua sponte where the defendant has not filed a responsive pleading and the time for doing so has not run. See Costlow v. Weeks, 790 F.2d 1486, 1488 (9th Cir. 1986). When jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity, venue is proper in (1) the district in which any defendant resides, if all of the defendants reside in the same state; (2) the district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
situated; or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). When venue is improper, the district court has the discretion to either dismiss the case or transfer it "in the interest of justice." See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). It is clear from the complaint herein that plaintiff is complaining about acts alleged to have been committed at PVSP by PVSP employees. PVSP is located in Coalinga, California, which is located in Fresno County. Fresno County, in turn, is located within the venue of the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b). As a result, venue is proper in the Eastern District of California, not in the Northern District. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, the above-titled action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The Clerk shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 19, 2008 _____________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?