Nuance Communications, Inc. v. Ecopy, Inc.

Filing 157

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 155 Stipulation, filed by Image Recognition Integrated Systems S.A., Image Recognition Integrated Systems, Inc., Image Recognition Integrated Systems Group, S.A.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/26/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2010)

Download PDF
1 RON E. SHULMAN, State Bar No. 178263 rshulman@wsgr.com 2 JULIE M. HOLLOWAY, State Bar No. 196942 jholloway@wsgr.com 3 S. MICHAEL SONG, State Bar No. 198656 msong@wsgr.com 4 TUNG-ON KONG, State Bar No. 205871 tkong@wsgr.com 5 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 6 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 7 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 8 M. CRAIG TYLER, Pro Hac Vice 9 ctyler@wsgr.com WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 10 Professional Corporation 900 South Capital of Texas Highway 11 Las Cimas IV, Fifth Floor Austin, Texas 78746-5546 12 Telephone: (512) 338.5400 Facsimile: (512) 338.5499 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff 14 NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 15 [Additional Counsel on Signature Page] 16 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case No.: C 08-04227 JSW-MEJ Consolidated With Case No.: C 08-04942 JSWM EJ 19 NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. AND CONSOLIDATED CASE. v. ECOPY, INC. et al., Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME Case Nos.: C 08-04227 JSW; C 08-04942 JSW 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the 2 parties, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and subject to the Court's approval, that the time set for filing a 3 Stipulated Protective Order pursuant to the Court's Order dated April 1, 2010, be, and it hereby is, 4 extended by one (1) week from April 22, 2010 to and including APRIL 29, 2010, to permit the 5 parties to finalize the form of the protective order. 6 As ordered by the Court, the parties have conferred in good faith to finalize the terms of a 7 protective order. The parties exchanged drafts. There are a few remaining issues that require 8 additional time to find mutually-agreeable resolution. 9 This is the first extension requested for this deadline. The extension is not anticipated to 10 materially impact the case schedule. This stipulation is made in good faith and without any intent 11 to cause delay or prejudice, but to allow the parties a reasonable opportunity to continue 12 negotiations to resolve their differences and permit finalization of a Stipulated Protective Order in 13 this case. The parties to this proceeding therefore request that the Honorable Court reset the 14 deadline for filing a Stipulated Protective Order for good cause shown herein. 15 16 Respectfully submitted, 17 18 Dated: April 22, 2010 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME Case Nos.: C 08-04227 JSW; C 08-04942 JSW WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI By:/s/ M. Craig Tyler WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 900 South Capital of Texas Highway Las Cimas IV, Fifth Floor Austin, Texas 78746-5546 Telephone: (512) 338.5400 Facsimile: (512) 338.5499 Attorneys for Plaintiff NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 1 Dated: April 22, 2010 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Michael E. Dergosits mdergosits@dergnoah.com DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 705-6377 Facsimile: (415) 705-6383 By: /s/ Robert M. Kunstadt (Pro Hac Vice) Ilaria Maggioni (Pro Hac Vice) R. KUNSTADT, P.C. 875 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1800 New York, NY 10001 Telephone: (212) 398-8881 Facsimile: (212) 398-2922 Attorneys for Plaintiff in Case No. C 08-04942 IMAGE RECOGNITION INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a I.R.I.S. INC. an d Attorneys for Defendants in Case No. C 08-04227 IMAGE RECOGNITION INTEGRATED SYSTEMS INC. d/b/a I.R.I.S. INC., IMAGE RECOGNITION INTEGRATED SYSTEMS S.A. d/b/a I.R.I.S. S.A., and IMAGE RECOGNITION INTEGRATED SYSTEMS GROUP S.A. d/b/a I.R.I.S. GROUP S.A. 18 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME Case Nos.: C 08-04227 JSW; C 08-04942 JSW April 26 Dated: ________, 2010 ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MARIA-ELENA JAMES 1 2 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45.X I, Ilaria Maggioni, hereby attest that concurrences in the filing of this document have 3 been obtained from each of the signatories. 4 5 Dated: April 22, 2010 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME Case Nos.: C 08-04227 JSW; C 08-04942 JSW By:/s/ Ilaria Maggioni

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?