Vnus Medical Technologies v Total Vein Solutions

Filing 19

ORDER POSTPONING HEARING ON TVS' MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE AND MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT. The hearing on TVS' motion to transfer venue and motion to dismiss is continued from November 14, 2008 to November 21, 2008. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 27, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Matthew B. Lehr (Bar No. 213139) Diem-Suong T. Nguyen (Bar No. 237557) Chung G. Suh (Bar No. 244889) DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL 1600 El Camino Real Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 752-2000 Facsimile: (650) 752-2111 Attorneys for Plaintiff VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO POSTPONE HEARING ON TVS' MOTION TO TRANSFER AND MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. C08-4234 MMC TOTAL VEIN SOLUTIONS, LLC d/b/a TOTAL VEIN SYSTEMS Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. C08-4234 MMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO POSTPONE HEARING ON TVS' MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE AND MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(B)(6) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc. ("VNUS") and Defendant Total Vein Solutions, LLC d/b/a Total Vein Systems ("TVS") have conferred and respectfully request that the hearing on TVS' Motion to Transfer Venue (D.I. 11) and Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (D.I. 13) be postponed from the noticed date of November 14, 2008 to November 21, 2008 for the following reasons: WHEREAS TVS filed a Motion to Transfer Venue on October 9, 2008 and filed a Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) on October 10, 2008, with both motions noticed to be heard on November 14, 2008. WHEREAS TVS and VNUS are currently engaged in settlement discussions and, in view of the interest of avoiding potentially unnecessary litigation expense and judicial effort, have agreed to postpone the hearing on TVS' motions from November 14 to November 21, 2008. This new noticed hearing date is the same hearing date for the Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue filed by TVS' principals, David S. Centanni and Tyrell L. Schiek, in the related case styled VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc. v. biolitec, Inc. et al., Case No. C08-03129 MMC (N.D. Cal.). WHEREAS such postponement will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. NOW THEREFORE, by and through their respective counsel, the undersigned parties respectfully request that the Court adjourn the hearing on TVS' Motion to Transfer Venue and Motion to Dismiss from November 14, 2008 to November 21, 2008. In accordance with Civil L.R. 7-3, VNUS' oppositions to such motions will be due on October 31, 2008, and TVS' replies to VNUS' oppositions will be due on November 7, 2008. Dated: October 23, 2008 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. /s/ Suong T. Nguyen Matthew B. Lehr (Bar No. 213139) Diem-Suong T. Nguyen (Bar No. 237557) Chung G. Suh (Bar No. 244889) DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL 1600 El Camino Real Menlo Park, CA 94025 (650) 752-2000/(650) 752-2111 (fax) nguyen@dpw.com 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO POSTPONE HEARING ON TVS' MOTION TO TRANSFER AND MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. C08-4234 MMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 23, 2008 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT TOTAL VEIN SOLUTIONS, LLC D/B/A TOTAL VEIN SYSTEMS /s/ John Carey John Carey Patterson & Sheridan, LLP 250 Cambridge Avenue, Suite 300 Palo Alto, California 94306-1549 (650) 330-2310/(650) 330-2314 (fax) jcarey@pattersonsheridan.com PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 27 , 2008 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO POSTPONE HEARING ON TVS' MOTION TO TRANSFER AND MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. C08-4234 MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?