Brown v. Equifax, Experian & Transunion

Filing 14

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS EXPERIAN AND TRANSUNION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing and no later than February 13, 2009, why plaintiff's claims against Experian and Transunion should not be dismissed for failure to serve them by January 9, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 27, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 At the Case Management Conference conducted December 19, 2008, plaintiff was ordered to serve defendants Experian and Transunion with a summons and copy of the complaint no later than January 9, 2009, and to file proof of such service no later than January 9, 2009. To date, plaintiff has failed to file proof of service of the summons and complaint on defendants Experian and Transunion. Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and no later than February 13, 2009, why plaintiff's claims against Experian and Transunion should not be dismissed for failure to serve within the time specified by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 27, 2009 v. EQUIFAX, EXPERIAN & TRANSUNION, Defendants / AUGUSTUS M. BROWN II, Plaintiff, No. 08-4246 MMC ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS EXPERIAN AND TRANSUNION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge