Brown v. Equifax, Experian & Transunion
ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS EXPERIAN AND TRANSUNION. Plaintiff's claims against Experian and Transunion are dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to timely serve said defendants. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 23, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 At the Case Management Conference conducted December 19, 2008, the Court ordered plaintiff to file, no later than January 9, 2009, proof of service of the summons and complaint on defendants Experian and Transunion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Because plaintiff failed to file proof that he caused the summons and complaint to be served on Experian and Transunion within the deadline set at the Case Management Conference, the Court, by order filed January 27, 2009, ordered plaintiff to show cause, in writing and no later than February 13, 2009, why his claims against Experian and Transunion should not be dismissed. Plaintiff has not filed a response to the Court's order within the time specified in the Court's order. Accordingly, plaintiff's claims against Experian and Transunion are hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to timely serve said defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 23, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge Defendants / United States District Court v. EQUIFAX, EXPERIAN & TRANSUNION, AUGUSTUS M. BROWN, II Plaintiff, No. C 08-4246 MMC ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS EXPERIAN AND TRANSUNION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?