Yee v. U.S. Secretary of Labor, Elaine Chao

Filing 83

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND CASE. The motion is denied, without prejudice to plaintiff's filing a new motion for leave to amend, accompanied by plaintiff's proposed amended pleading, specifically, her Proposed First Amended Complaint. Any such motion shall be filed no later than August 21, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 5, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is plaintiff's "Motion to Amend Case," filed June 29, 2009. On July 8, 2009, the Court directed plaintiff to submit, no later than July 24, 2009, a copy of her proposed amended pleading. (See Order filed July 8, 2009.) On July 15, 2009, plaintiff responded by filing a "Proposed Amendment to Case," in which plaintiff sets forth a proposed amendment to her Case Management Statement, filed February 23, 2009 in connection with the February 27, 2009 Case Management Conference. Plaintiff's filing, however, does not constitute a proposed amended pleading. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a) (setting forth "pleadings" allowed in civil action). Accordingly, plaintiff's Motion to Amend is hereby DENIED, without prejudice to plaintiff's filing a new motion for leave to amend, accompanied by plaintiff's proposed amended pleading, specifically, her Proposed First Amended Complaint. Any such motion shall be filed no later than August 21, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 5, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge v. HILDA SOLIS, Secretary of Labor, Defendant. / United States District Court CHARLOTTE YEE, Plaintiff, No. C-08-4259 MMC ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND CASE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA