"In re Nvidia Corporation Securities Litigation"

Filing 11

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION FOR CONSOLIDATION POTENTIAL RELATED CASES re 5 Stipulation is premature, It is the Court's policy, to evaluate

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Lisa Miller, et al., v. Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 08-04260 JW ORDER DENYING STIPULATION FOR CONSOLIDATING POTENTIAL RELATED CASES

United United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Nvidia Corp., et al., Defendants. /

Presently before the Court is the parties' Joint Stipulation Regarding Related Cases and Continuing Date Upon Which Responsive Pleading is Due. (Docket Item No. 5.) The parties contend that all future actions that are related to this action within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) should be prospectively consolidated with this action. It is the Court's policy, however, to evaluate each potentially related case on an individual basis before any consolidation. As such, the parties' Stipulation is premature. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the parties' Stipulation for Consolidation of Potential Related Cases.

Dated: October 3, 2008

JAMES WARE United States District Judge

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Aaron M. Sheanin [e-mail] James Elliott Thompson [e-mail] James Neil Kramer [e-mail] Jonathan Krasne Levine [e-mail]

Dated: October 3, 2008

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28