"In re Nvidia Corporation Securities Litigation"

Filing 182

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/21/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2011)

*E-Filed 4/21/11*

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

MICHAEL D. TORPEY (SBN 79424)
Email: [e-mail]
JAMES N. KRAMER (SBN 154709)
Email: [e-mail]
JUSTIN M. LICHTERMAN (SBN 225734)
Email: [e-mail]
JAMES E. THOMPSON (SBN 240979)
Email: [e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

8
9

Attorneys for Defendants
NVIDIA CORPORATION and JEN-HSUN HUANG

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14

In re NVIDIA CORPORATION
SECURITIES LITIGATION,

CLASS ACTION

15
16

Case No. 08-cv-04260-RS

This Document Relates To:
ALL ACTIONS.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE

17
Judge:

Honorable Richard Seeborg

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OHS WEST:261133565.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. 08-CV-04260-RS

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

WHEREAS, on April 15, 2011, the Court continued the hearing on Defendants’ Motion
to Dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint (“SCAC”) to June 2, 2011;
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a forty-five (45) page Opposition to
Defendants Motion to Dismiss the SCAC (“Opposition”);
WHEREAS, Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition (“Reply”) is currently due on
May 5, 2011;
WHEREAS, key Orrick attorneys working on the Reply are currently out of the office
due to religious holidays;
WHEREAS, in order to ensure that Defendants can fully address all issues thoroughly

10

and in a manner beneficial to the Court, the Parties agree to extend the deadline for Defendants’

11

Reply by eight (8) days to May 13, 2011. All other dates previously established by the Court,

12

including the June 2, 2011 hearing date, shall remain unchanged. The extended filing deadline

13

complies with the applicable local rules of the Court.

14
15
16
17

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and
between undersigned counsel, subject to approval of the Court, that:
1.

Defendants’ Reply shall be due on or before Friday, May 13, 2011.

SO STIPULATED.

18
Respectfully submitted:

19
20

Dated: April 21, 2011

21

ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
By:

/s/ James E. Thompson
James E. Thompson
Attorney for Defendants
NVIDIA CORPORATION and JEN-HSUN HUANG

22
23

The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2669

24
25
26
27
28
OHS WEST:261133565.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. 08-CV-04260-RS

1

Dated: April 21, 2011

MILBERG LLP

2
3

By:

/s/ Barry A. Weprin
Barry A. Weprin (admitted pro hac vice)
Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class

4
5

1 Penn Plaza
49th Floor
New York, NY 10119

6
7

Dated: April 21, 2011

KAHN SWICK & FOTI LLC

8
9

By:

/s/ Kim E. Miller
Kim E. Miller (SBN 178370)
Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class

10
11

500 5th Avenue, Suite 1810
New York, NY 10110

12
Dated: April 21, 2011

GIRARD GIBBS LLP

13
14
By:

/s/ Jonathan K. Levine
Jonathan K. Levine (SBN 220289)
Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class

15
16

601 California Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, CA 94108

17
18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21
22

Dated: 4/21/11
THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28
OHS WEST:261133565.1

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. 08-CV-04260-RS