"In re Nvidia Corporation Securities Litigation"

Filing 184

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 183 CONTINUING HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Motion Hearing set for 7/28/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/11/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 5/11/11* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MICHAEL D. TORPEY (SBN 79424) Email: mtorpey@orrick.com JAMES N. KRAMER (SBN 154709) Email: jkramer@orrick.com JUSTIN M. LICHTERMAN (SBN 225734) Email: jlichterman@orrick.com JAMES E. THOMPSON (SBN 240979) Email: jthompson@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 Telephone: (415) 773-5700 Facsimile: (415) 773-5759 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants NVIDIA CORPORATION and JEN-HSUN HUANG 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 In re NVIDIA CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, CLASS ACTION 15 16 Case No. 08-cv-04260-RS This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. 17 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 18 Judge: Honorable Richard Seeborg 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING – CASE NO. 08-CV-04260-RS OHS WEST:261146306.1 1 2 3 4 5 WHEREAS, on April 15, 2011, the Court continued the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint (“SCAC”) to June 2, 2011; WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants have an unavoidable scheduling conflict on June 2, 2011 and would otherwise be unable to attend the hearing; WHEREAS, in order to ensure that Defendants can fully address all issues thoroughly 6 and in a manner beneficial to the Court, the Parties agree to continue the hearing on Defendants’ 7 Motion to Dismiss to July 28, 2011. All other dates previously established by the Court, shall 8 remain unchanged. 9 10 11 12 13 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between undersigned counsel, subject to approval of the Court, that: 1. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the SCAC shall be continued to July 28, 2011 at 1:30 pm. SO STIPULATED. 14 Respectfully submitted: 15 16 Dated: May 11, 2011 17 By: /s/ James E. Thompson James E. Thompson Attorney for Defendants NVIDIA CORPORATION and JEN-HSUN HUANG 18 19 The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 20 21 22 ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP Dated: May 11, 2011 MILBERG LLP 23 24 By: /s/ Barry A. Weprin Barry A. Weprin (admitted pro hac vice) Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class 25 26 1 Penn Plaza 49th Floor New York, NY 10119 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING – CASE NO. 08-CV-04260-RS OHS WEST:261146306.1 1 Dated: May 11, 2011 KAHN SWICK & FOTI LLC 2 3 By: /s/ Kim E. Miller Kim E. Miller (SBN 178370) Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class 4 5 500 5th Avenue, Suite 1810 New York, NY 10110 6 7 Dated: May 11, 2011 GIRARD GIBBS LLP 8 9 By: /s/ Jonathan K. Levine Jonathan K. Levine (SBN 220289) Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class 10 11 601 California Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94108 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 Dated: 5/11/11 THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2OHS WEST:261146306.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING – CASE NO. 08-CV-04260-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?