"In re Nvidia Corporation Securities Litigation"
Filing
190
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 189 CONTINUING HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Motion Hearing set for 8/25/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/27/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2011)
*E-Filed 5/27/11*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Kim E. Miller (SBN 178370)
KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC
500 5th Ave., Suite 1810
New York, New York 10110
Telephone: (212) 696-3730
Facsimile: (504) 455-1498
-andLewis S. Kahn (admitted pro hac vice)
206 Covington Street
Madisonville, Louisiana 70447
Telephone: (504)455-1400
Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the
Class
Jonathan K. Levine (SBN 220289)
GIRARD GIBBS LLP
601 California Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone: (415) 981-4800
Facsimile: (415) 981-4846
Liaison Counsel for the Class
9
10
11
12
13
14
Barry A. Weprin (admitted pro hac vice)
Leigh Smith (admitted pro hac vice)
MILBERG LLP
1 Penn Plaza
49th Floor
New York, New York 10119
Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the
Class
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
IN RE NVIDIA CORPORATION
SECURITIES LITIGATION
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
This Document Relates To: All Actions.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
MASTER FILE NUMBER:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-CV-4260-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
JUDGE: Hon. Richard Seeborg
1
2
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2011, the Court continued the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint (“SCAC”) to June 2, 2011;
3
WHEREAS, on May 11, 2011, the Court continued the foregoing hearing on Defendants’
4
Motion to Dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint (“SCAC”) to July 28, 2011, due to
5
an unavoidable conflict raised by counsel for Defendants;
6
WHEREAS, counsel for Lead Plaintiffs have a prior, unavoidable scheduling conflict on
7
July 28, 2011, which was inadvertently overlooked, and would otherwise be unable to attend the
8
hearing;
9
WHEREAS, in order to ensure that Lead Plaintiffs can fully address all issues thoroughly
10
and in a manner beneficial to the Court, the Parties agree to continue the hearing on Defendants’
11
Motion to Dismiss to August 25, 2011. All other dates previously established by the Court, shall
12
remain unchanged.
13
14
15
16
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between undersigned counsel,
subject to the approval of the Court, that:
1.
The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the SCAC shall be continued to
August 25, 2011, at 1:30 pm.
17
18
Dated: May 25, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
19
20
KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC
MILBERG LLP
21
By:
/s/ Kim E. Miller
Kim E. Miller (SBN 178370)
500 5th Avenue, Suite 1810
New York, New York 10110
Telephone: (212) 696-3730
Facsimile: (504) 455-1498
kim.miller@ksfcounsel.com
By:
/s/ Barry A. Weprin
Barry A. Weprin (admitted pro hac vice)
Leigh Smith (admitted pro hac vice)
1 Penn Plaza
49th Floor
New York, New York 10119
Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class
22
23
24
25
26
Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the
Class
27
28
1
1
GIRARD GIBBS LLP
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
2
By:
/s/ Jonathan K. Levine
Jonathan K. Levine (SBN 220289)
601 California Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone: (415) 981-4800
Facsimile: (415) 981-4846
Email: jkl@girardgibbs.com
By: ____/s/ Jim Kramer _____
Jim Kramer (SBN 154709)
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
(415) 773-5923
jkramer@orrick.com
3
4
5
6
7
8
Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Counsel for Defendants
Class
9
ORDER
10
11
12
13
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
5/27/11
DATED: ___________________
THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?