Castaneda v. Burger King Corporation et al
Filing
221
ORDER DENYING 220 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM CONCERNING CASE MANAGEMENT ISSUES. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 23, 2009. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2009) Modified on 9/24/2009 (sis, COURT STAFF).
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MIGUEL CASTANEDA, KATHERINE CORBETT, and JOSEPH WELLNER, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. BURGER KING CORPORATION and BURGER KING HOLDINGS, INC., Defendants. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. C 08-04262 WHA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM CONCERNING CASE MANAGEMENT ISSUES
Plaintiffs have moved pursuant to Local Rule 7-11 for leave to file a supplemental memorandum in support of their motion for class certification. They have asked for permission to file their requested supplemental pleading on or before September 30, 2009, with any response from defendant due a week after that on October 7, 2009. The motion is DENIED. The motion for class certification has already been voluminously briefed and argued. Another round of briefing would take at least two weeks to complete, and would unduly delay the Court's deliberative process and forthcoming order regarding class certification.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 23, 2009.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
