Castaneda v. Burger King Corporation et al

Filing 320

ORDER RE PARTIES' MOTION TO REVISE EXISTING SCHEDULING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 23, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MIGUEL CASTANEDA, KATHERINE CORBETT, and JOSEPH WELLNER, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BURGER KING CORPORATION, Defendant. / No. C 08-04262 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ORDER RE PARTIES' MOTION TO REVISE EXISTING SCHEDULING ORDERS

If the Court receives a fully executed and final version of a stipulation of settlement in this matter on or before March 4, 2010, the Court will consider whether to use the hearing on the parties' respective motions for partial summary judgment now set for March 18 to instead consider a joint motion for preliminary approval of the settlement agreement. Meanwhile, the hearing on the motions for partial summary judgment will remain on calendar as previously scheduled. The parties' motion to revise the existing scheduling order based on their averment that they have "agreed in principle" to a settlement is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2010.

WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE