Castaneda v. Burger King Corporation et al

Filing 47

ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY OF CERTAIN DISCOVERY [re 37 MOTION to Stay Certain Discovery Pending Ruling on Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed by Burger King Corporation]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 1/8/2009. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MIGUEL CASTANEDA, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. BURGER KING CORPORATION and BURGER KING HOLDINGS, INC., Defendants. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C 08-04262 WHA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY OF CERTAIN DISCOVERY The Court regrets that counsel for the moving party cancelled the hearing on the discovery dispute matter set for January 9, 2009, at 1:30 p.m. It turns out that there is no convenient date in the foreseeable future due to an extremely heavy trial calendar since last November and continuing through June 2009. As a result, this matter will have to be heard when it was originally noticed, namely FEBRUARY 12, 2009, AT 8:00 A.M. Due to a clerical error, the telephone notice of January 7 renoticing the hearing for January 12 (at counsel's request) is no longer available. Plaintiff's opposition is due on January 22 and the reply is due January 29. The Court regrets that it is so pressed with other matters and it will give consideration to referring all discovery matters to a magistrate judge. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 8, 2009. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?