United States of America v. Caraway et al

Filing 211

ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES' MOTION TO SERVE ESTATE BY PUBLICATION; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES. Notice shall be published in an approved newspaper for Washoe County and San Mateo County and shall appear in those newspapers not less than once per week for a period of not less than six consecutive weeks, the first such publication appearing no later than one week from the date of entry of this Order. The United States shall file with the Court a certification of publication upon completi on of such publication. The Estate of Lorraine Caraway and/or any heir, devisee, legatee, or any person or entity claiming an interest through the Estate of Lorraine Caraway shall appear or plead in this matter no later than eight weeks form the date of entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 11/1/16. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Case No. C-08-04371-MMC Plaintiff, GRANTING UNITED STATES' v. DOUGLAS R. CARAWAY; FREMONT BANK; STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD; STATE OF CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT; SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION; CHESTER J. GILBERT; COLLECTRONICS, INC.; JOHN EGGLI; COLLECTION BUREAU OF CALIFORNIA; AMANDA AND FRED HUMMEL; STEPHEN CARAWAY; FLORENCE LINOR REGE; C. THOMAS BISCARDI, ESTATE OF LORRAINE K. CARAWAY, and PATRICK R. GILES, [PROPOSED] ORDER TO APPEAR OR PLEAD MOTION TO SERVE ESTATE BY PUBLICATION; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES Defendants. 24 25 The United States of America, through undersigned counsel, has moved for an order under 28 26 U.S.C. § 1655 compelling the Estate of Lorraine Caraway, and/or any heirs, legatees, devisees or any 27 person or entity claiming an interest through Lorraine Caraway or her Estate, to appear or plead by a day 28 certain and for leave to serve that order by publication. [proposed] Order To Appear or Plead C-08-04371-MMC 1 1 BACKGROUND 2 On September 17, 2008, the United States brought this action to foreclose federal tax liens San Mateo 3 against a parcel of real property ("subject property") located in Santa Clara County, California. The ^ 4 United States sought to foreclose the tax liens and sell the subject property to satisfy, in part, unpaid The United States submitted a declaration indicating that defendant 5 federal income tax assessments against Defendant Douglas Caraway. Defendant Douglas Caraway ^ 6 conveyed a 17% interest in the subject property to Lorraine Caraway prior to her death in 2002. 7 ^ See Declaration of Kathryn Clark, ECF 179-1. Pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7403(b), all parties who may claim an interest in the subject property are 8 9 to be named as a party to the action. The United States failed to name Lorraine Caraway or her estate as 10 a party to this action. Subsequently, the IRS attempted to sell the property at auction pursuant to the 11 Second Amended Judgment and Decree of Sale, however, the purchaser was unable to obtain title 12 insurance because of the 17% interest of Lorraine Caraway. See Declaration of Kathryn Clark, ECF 13 179-1. 14 Defendant, Douglas Caraway, filed a Motion for Relief from Order, filed August 12, 2016, 15 which came before the court for hearing on September 23, 2016. After hearing argument, the Court 16 entered an Order on September 23, 2016, ordering the United States to file an amended Complaint 17 adding the Estate of Lorraine Caraway as a party to this action, and to either serve the Estate of Lorraine 18 Caraway or to request service by publication pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1655, accompanied by an affidavit 19 in support thereof, and a proposed order. 20 The United States has filed a First Amended Complaint adding the Estate of Lorraine Caraway and a Second Amended Complaint adding the unknown heirs of Lorraine Caraway as defendants 21 as a defendant. Because Lorraine Caraway died in Sparks, Nevada, Washoe County, the IRS assigned ^ was asked 22 Revenue Officer Robert C. Kalman in Reno, Nevada, to research county records to determine if the ^ 23 Estate of Lorraine Caraway was probated since her death in 2002. See ECF 190-1, Lorraine Caraway’s 24 death certificate. Revenue Officer Kalman researched records in Washoe County and determined that 25 no probate had been opened for Lorraine Caraway’s estate. The United States submitted Revenue 26 Officer Kalman’s Declaration in support of its Motion for Leave to Serve the Estate of Lorraine , setting forth the above facts as to his investigation. 27 Caraway by Publication. ^ 28 [proposed] Order To Appear or Plead C-08-04371-MMC 2 1 Before the Court is the United States’ Motion for Leave to Serve the Estate of Lorraine Caraway 2 by Publication. For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that: 3 1. The United States’ Motion is GRANTED; 4 2. The Estate of Lorraine Caraway and/or any heir, devisee, legatee or any person or entity shall 5 claiming an interest through the Estate of Lorraine Caraway, to appear or plead in this matter 6 not later than eight weeks from the date of entry of this Order; 7 ^ be 3. Notice of this Order shall by published in an approved newspaper for Washoe County, ^ San Mateo 8 Nevada, the residence of Lorraine Caraway at her date of death, and Santa Clara County, 9 California, the location of the subject property, and shall appear in those newspapers not less 10 11 12 ^ than once per week for a period of not less than six consecutive weeks; , the first such publication appearing no later than one week from the date of entry of this Order; 4. ^ The United States shall file with the Court a certification of publication upon completion the requirements of paragraph 3, above. 13 14 1 November SO ORDERED this _____ day of ________, 2016. 15 _____________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [proposed] Order To Appear or Plead C-08-04371-MMC 3 of

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?