United States of America v. Caraway et al
Filing
256
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS AMANDA HUMMEL, FRED HUMMEL, AND FLORENCE LINOR REGE. The hearing scheduled for May 26, 2017, is vacated. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 05/03/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/3/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
DOUGLAS R. CARAWAY, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 08-cv-04371-MMC
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST
DEFENDANTS AMANDA HUMMEL,
FRED HUMMEL, AND FLORENCE
LINOR REGE
Re: Dkt. No. 248
12
13
Before the Court is plaintiff’s “Motion for Default Judgment Against Amanda
14
Hummel, Fred Hummel, and Florence Linor Rege,” filed April 17, 2017, pursuant to Rule
15
55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. No opposition has been filed. Having
16
read and considered the papers filed in support of the motion, the Court deems the
17
matter appropriate for determination on the written submissions, and, for the reasons set
18
forth therein, the motion is hereby GRANTED.
19
Accordingly, said defendants are hereby ADJUDGED to have no right, title, claim,
20
lien, or other interest in the real property known as 734 Neal Avenue, San Carlos,
21
California, and the Clerk shall enter default judgment in accordance therewith in favor of
22
plaintiff and against defendants Amanda Hummel, Fred Hummel, and Florence Linore
23
Rege.
24
25
26
27
28
In light of the above, the hearing scheduled for May 26, 2017, is hereby
VACATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 3, 2017
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?