Jewel et al v. National Security Agency et al

Filing 93

ORDER GRANTING 91 STIPULATION RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: Motion Hearing set for 11/2/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 7/3/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2012)

Case3:08-cv-04373-JSW Document91 Filed07/02/12 Page7 of 8

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9
10

CAROLYN JEWEL, et al.,

11

Plaintiffs,

12

v.

13

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:08-cv-04373-JSW
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Judge Jeffrey S. White

16

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing,

17

It is hereby ORDERED that:

18

(1)

defendant’s combined cross-dispositive motion and opposition to Plaintiffs’ partial

19

motion for summary judgment shall be filed on or before August 31, 2012; (2) plaintiffs’ combined

20

opposition to defendants’ cross-dispositive motion and reply in support of their partial motion for

21

summary judgment shall be filed on or before October 5, 2012; (3) defendants’ reply in support of

22

their cross-dispositive motion shall be filed on or before October 19, 2012; and (4) a hearing on the

23

parties’ cross-motions shall be held on November 2, 2012.

24

It is further ORDERED that if the parties file any combined opposition and cross-motion or

25

combined opposition and reply, they will be permitted up to the combined total number of pages

26

allowed for each submission under the local rules in lieu of filing separate opposition, cross-

27

motion, or reply briefs.

28

In addition, dispositive motions by the individual capacity defendants concerning the claims
Case No. 08-cv-4373-JSW

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case3:08-cv-04373-JSW Document91 Filed07/02/12 Page8 of 8

1

against them need not be submitted until after resolution of any dispositive motion by the

2

Government Defendants sued in their official capacities. The deadline for the individual capacity

3

defendants to respond to the complaint is hereby extended until 60 days after the issuance of an

4

order by this Court deciding the parties’ cross-motions.

5

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

July 2, 2012
DATED: ____________

________________________________
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey S. White

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 08-cv-4373-JSW

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE