Yanke v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 59

ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on April 16, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On March 20, 2009, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order to continue the initial case management conference which stated, among other things, that the parties stipulated that Defendants would have twenty days to respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. The Court granted the request to continue the case management conference on March 23, 2009. In the Court's separate March 23, 2009 Order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss, the Court ordered that Defendants' response would be due ten days after the filing of the Second Amended Complaint. Defendants have asked the Court for clarification regarding the time for Defendants' response to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, which was filed on April 6, 2009. In light of the parties' March 20, 2009 stipulation, the time to respond to the Second Amended Complaint shall be twenty days from April 6, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 16, 2009 v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants. / CHRISTOPHER YANKE, Plaintiff, No. C-08-04379 EDL ORDER REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge