Yanke v. City of Oakland et al
Filing
86
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 85 Stipulation filed by Stephen Raffle. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on August 12, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2009)
Case3:08-cv-04379-EDL Document85
Filed08/11/09 Page1 of 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Robert T. Lynch, SBN 34716 Claudia Lozano, SBN 188742 LYNCH, GILARDI & GRUMMER A Professional Corporation 475 Sansome Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 397-2800 Facsimile: (415) 397-0937 Attorneys for Defendant STEPHEN M. RAFFLE, M.D.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHRISTOPHER YANKE, Plaintiff(s), vs. CITY OF OAKLAND, WAYNE TUCKER, DEBRA TAYLOR JOHNSON, KENNETH PARRIS, STEPHEN RAFFLE, M.D., AND DOES 1-10, Defendant(s).
Case No.: C-08-04379 EDL STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND TO CONTINUE THE ADR CONFERENCE Trial Date: NONE
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lynch, Gilardi & Grummer A Professional Corporation 475 Sansome Street Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94111 Ph (415) 397-2800 Fax (415) 397-0937
Defendant STEPHEN M. RAFFLE, M.D., Defendants CITY OF OAKLAND, WAYNE TUCKER, DEBRA TAYLOR JOHNSON AND KENNETH PARRIS ("CITY DEFENDANTS") and Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER YANKE, stipulate, through their respective counsels of record, as follows: 1. To continue the Initial Case Management Conference, currently set for September
1, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. to September 22, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. 2. To continue the deadline to exchange initial disclosures to September 22, 2009.
26 27 28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND TO CONTINUE THE ADR CONFERENCE
Case3:08-cv-04379-EDL Document85
Filed08/11/09 Page2 of 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lynch, Gilardi & Grummer 475 Sansome Street Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94111 Ph (415) 397-2800 Fax (415) 397-0937
3.
To continue the ADR Conference currently set for August 12, 2009 at 10:30 a.m.
to September 8, 2009 at 10:30 a.m. 4. Good cause exists for the above requests. On August 10, 2009, the Court
continued the Case Management Conference from August 18, 2009 to September 1, 2009, to provide the Court with additional time to rule on defendants Motions to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint, heard on June 26, 2009 with additional supplemental briefing filed on June 30, 2009. 5. As soon as counsel received notice of the continued Conference to September 1,
2009, all counsel notified one another of existing conflicts which would prevent attendance on September 1st and on the following two Tuesdays, September 8th and 15th, 2009. The parties agree to continue the Case Management Conference to September 22, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. so that all counsel may attend. 6. Having the deadline to complete initial disclosures prior to a ruling from the
Court on defendants' motions to dismiss, which may resolve most or all of the issues raised by plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint is not efficient and may be a waste of the Court's time and resources. The parties agree that it in the interest of judicial economy it makes sense to continue the deadline to complete initial disclosures to September 22, 2009, the date on which the parties agree to continue the Case Management Conference to. 7. The parties further request that the Court continue the ADR Telephone
Conference to September 8, 2009, a date which is commensurate with the new date of the Initial Case Management Conference. 8. The parties stipulate that a copy of a signature transmitted by any electronic
means including, but not limited to, facsimile machine and scanned document transmitted via email will have the same force and effect as an original signature.
26 27 28 2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND TO CONTINUE THE ADR CONFERENCE
Case3:08-cv-04379-EDL Document85
Filed08/11/09 Page3 of 4
1 2 3
DATED:
August 10, 2009
LYNCH, GILARDI & GRUMMER
By 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lynch, Gilardi & Grummer 475 Sansome Street Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94111 Ph (415) 397-2800 Fax (415) 397-0937
/s/ Robert T. Lynch Claudia Lozano Attorneys for Defendant STEPHEN M. RAFFLE, M.D.
DATED:
August 10, 2009
KNISBACHER LAW OFFICES
By: ___/s/_______________________ Alden Knisbacher Attorney for Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER YANKE
DATED:
August 10, 2009
BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT
By
/s/ Eugene B. Elliot Christine Lee Michael Wenzel Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF OAKLAND, WAYNE TUCKER, DEBRA TAYLOR JOHNSON AND KENNETH PARRIS
26 27 28 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND TO CONTINUE THE ADR CONFERENCE
Case3:08-cv-04379-EDL Document85
Filed08/11/09 Page4 of 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lynch, Gilardi & Grummer 475 Sansome Street Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94111 Ph (415) 397-2800 Fax (415) 397-0937
ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, the stipulation to continue the Initial Case Management Conference from September 1, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. to September 22, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. is GRANTED. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, the stipulation to continue the deadline to exchange initial disclosures to September 22, 2009 is GRANTED. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, the stipulation to continue the ADR Conference to September 8, 2009 at 10:30 a.m., a date commensurate with the new date for the Initial Case Management Conference is GRANTED.
UNIT ED
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T
RT U O
August 12, 2009 DATED:__________________
\\Sfdata\Conversion\0086-0529\P\190968.doc
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
26 27 28 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND TO CONTINUE THE ADR CONFERENCE
A
C
LI
FO
Judge E
lizabeth
D. Lapo
rte
R NIA
________________________________________ ERED O ORD THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE IT IS S
NO
S
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?