Autodesk Inc. v. Dassault Systemes Solid Works Corporation

Filing 200

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO MOVE FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE [re 199 Stipulation filed by Dassault Systemes Solid Works Corporation]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 12/14/2009. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02966.51459/3242826.1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) Evette D. Pennypacker (Bar No. 203515) Andrea Pallios Roberts (Bar No. 228128) Zachary M. Fabish (Bar No. 247535) 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 Attorneys for Defendant Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION AUTODESK, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, v. DASSAULT SYSTÈMES SOLIDWORKS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant and Counterclaimant. Case No. 3:08-cv-04397-WHA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DECEMBER 16, 2009 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ; ORDER DENYING STIPULATION The Court scheduled a Pretrial Conference for Wednesday, December 16 at 2:00 p.m. SolidWorks' lead trial counsel has a previously-scheduled telephonic Case Management Conference before Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg in the matter of YieldBoost v. Photon Dynamics, Inc., Case No. 5:09-cv-03828-RS that afternoon and is concerned that the two conferences will interfere with one another. SolidWorks requests that the Court reschedule the December 16 pretrial conference, preferably to a time earlier that day. NOW THEREFORE, SolidWorks respectfully requests that the December 16, 2009 pretrial conference be rescheduled. Autodesk stipulates that it has no objection to scheduling this conference at a time earlier in the day on December 16, 2009. Case No. 3:08-cv-04397-WHA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Dated: December 14, 2009 Dated: December 14, 2009 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP By: /s/ Claude M. Stern CLAUDE M. STERN Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, DASSAULT SYSTÈMES SOLIDWORKS CORPORATION MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Michael Jacobs MICHAEL JACOBS Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, AUTODESK, INC. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: December ___, 2009 DENIED. UNIT ED 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02966.51459/3242826.1 S S DISTRICT TE C TA HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP United States District Court Judge ER N F D IS T IC T O R -2- Case No. 3:08-cv-04397-WHA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER A C LI FO Judge W illiam A lsup R NIA T THOU ED WI E DENI DIC PREJU RT U O NO RT H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02966.51459/3242826.1 ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, I hereby attest that I conferred with Michael Jacobs of Morrison & Foerster LLP, attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant AUTODESK, INC., and obtained agreement to the filing of this electronically filed document. Dated: December 14, 2009 By: /s Claude M. Stern Claude M. Stern -3- Case No. 3:08-cv-04397-WHA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?