Autodesk Inc. v. Dassault Systemes Solid Works Corporation

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 21, 2009. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2009)

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-04397-WHA Document 34 Filed 01/20/2009 Page 1 of 3 1 Michael A. Jacobs (CA SBN 111664) MJacobs@mo fo.com 2 J. Thomas McCarthy (CA SBN 034728) TMcCarthy@mo fo.com 3 Lynn M. Humphreys (CA SBN 168062) LHumphreys@mo fo.com 4 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street 5 San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 6 Facsimile: (415) 269-7522 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff AUTODESK, INC. 8 9 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) 10 Brian C. Cannon (Bar No. 193071) Andrea Pallios Roberts (Bar No. 228128) 11 Zachary M. Fabish (Bar No. 247535) 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 12 Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 13 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 14 Attorneys for Defendant 15 DASSAULT SYSTÈMES SOLIDWORKS CORPORATION 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 AUTODESK, INC., , CASE NO. 3:08-cv-04397-WHA 19 Plaint iff, 20 vs. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 21 ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S DASSAULT SYSTÈMES SOLIDWORKS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 22 CORPORATION AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE THERETO 23 Defendant. 24 25 26 27 28 51459/2760278.1 CASE NO. 3:08-CV-04397-WHA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE THERETO Case 3:08-cv-04397-WHA Document 34 Filed 01/20/2009 Page 2 of 3 1 Whereas, on January 7, 2009, Plaintiff Autodesk, Inc. ("Autodesk") filed a Motion for 2 Leave to Amend the Complaint and attached its [Proposed] First Amended Complaint as Exhibit 3 A to its motion; 4 Whereas, a hearing on Autodesk's Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint is 5 calendared for February 12, 2009; 6 Whereas, although Defendant Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corporation ("SolidWorks") 7 does not concede any of the allegations set forth in the proposed amendments, SolidWorks will 8 not oppose Autodesk's Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint; 9 Plaint iff Autodesk and Defendant SolidWorks hereby stipulate that Autodesk shall file the 10 [Proposed] First Amended Complaint attached as Exhibit A to its motion by January 23, 2009, and 11 SolidWorks shall have until February 13, 2009 to file its response thereto. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 51459/2760278.1 So stipulated. DATED: January 20, 2009 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By /s/ Michael A. Jacobs Michael A. Jacobs Attorneys for Plaintiff Autodesk, Inc. QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP By /s/ Claude M. Stern Claude M. Stern Attorneys for Defendant Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corporation. CASE NO. 3:08-CV-04397-WHA -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE THERETO Case 3:08-cv-04397-WHA Document 34 Filed 01/20/2009 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 DATED: January___, 2009 21 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 51459/2760278.1 ORDER Pursuant to the foregoing st ipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED. S ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O UNIT ED N F D IS T IC T O R CASE NO. 3:08-CV-04397-WHA -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE THERETO A J dge Hon. WilliamuAlsup United States District Judge ER C LI FO William Alsup R NIA O IT IS S ORDER ED NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?