Kaur et al v. Scharfen

Filing 8

STIPULATION TO DISMISS; ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 11, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2008)

Download PDF
1 J OSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, CSBN 44332 United States Attorney 2 J OANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143 Chief, Civil Division 3 EDWARD A. OLSEN, CSBN 214150 Assistant United States Attorney 4 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 5 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-6915 6 FAX: (415) 436-6927 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) No. C 08-4435 MMC ) ) ) STIPULATION TO DISMISS; AND ) [PROPOSED] ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) 11 KULWANT KAUR, MANPREET KAUR and GURPREET SINGH, 12 P l ai n ti ff s , 13 v. 14 J ONATHAN SCHARFEN, Acting Director, 15 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, 16 17 D ef en d a n t . The plaintiffs, by and through their attorney of record, and defendant, by and through his 18 attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, to dismiss the above-entitled 19 action without prejudice in light of the fact that the United States Citizenship and Immigration 20 Services (USCIS) has acted on the plaintiff's I-485 applications for adjustment of status. 21 Each of the parties shall bear their own costs and fees. 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 STIPULATION TO DISMISS C 08-4435 MMC 1 1 Dated: December 9, 2008 2 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: December 9, 2008 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO DISMISS C 08-4435 MMC 2 Dated: December 11, 2008 Respectfully submitted, J OSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s/ EDWARD A. OLSEN Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant /s/ ALAN M. KAUFMAN KAUFMAN & KAUFMAN Attorney for Plaintiffs O RD ER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. _______________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?