Kerner v. Mendez et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME for Defendant United Airlines to Answer Plaintiff's Amended Complaint re 18 . Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 3/2/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Richard G. Grotch, Esq. ­ SBN 127713 Sarvenaz J. Fahimi, Esq. ­SBN 226148 CO DDING TO N, HICKS & DANFORTH A Professional Corporation, Lawyers 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300 Redwood City, California 94065-2133 Tel. [phone] Fax.[phone] E-mail: [e-mail] ATTO RNEYS FOR Defendant UNITED AIR LINES, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NO RTH ERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS plaintiff Mary C. Kerner filed her original Complaint in this case on September 29, 2008; and WHEREAS defendant United Air Lines, Inc., (hereinafter "United"erroneously sued herein as United Airlines (UAL)) filed a motion to dismiss the original Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6); and WHEREAS plaintiff filed her Amended Complaint on February 24, 2009, which mooted United's Motion to Dismiss directed to the Original Complaint; and WHEREAS United intends to move to dismiss plaintiff's Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6); and /// / //
S tip u la tio n Seeking Order Extending Time for D e fe n d a n t United Airlines to Answer Plaintiff's A m e n d e d Complaint [Civil L.R. 7-12]; C a s e No. C 08 4528 EDL

M ARY C. KERNER, Plaintiff, v s. JORGE MENDEZ, PATRICK PHILIPS, KEN SMART, UNITED AIRLINES (UAL), Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. /

No. C 08 4528 EDL STIPULATION SEEKING ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT UNITED AIRLINES TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT [C IVIL L.R. 7-12] Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

WHEREAS it is in the interests of judicial economy to allow the Court to consider and rule upon United's motion and plaintiff's opposition thereto, prior to the time that United files an answer, if any is required; Plaintiff and United, through its counsel of record, respectfully move the Court, jointly, pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, for an order extending the time within which United may answer plaintiff's Amended Complaint, if an answer is necessary, to and including, 10 days after the Court issues its ruling on United's Motion to Dismiss. Dated: February 25, 2009 Respectfully submitted, SHAPIRO AND SHAPIRO

/s/ Carl B. Shapiro B y: Carl B. Shapiro Attorneys for Plaintiff Mary C. Kerner

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH A Professional Corp., Lawyers 5 5 5 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300 R ed w o o d City, CA 94065 (6 5 0 ) 592-5400

CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH

/s/ Sarvenaz J. Fahimi B y: Sarvenaz J. Fahimi (*) Attorneys for Defendant United Air Lines, Inc. (*) I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT ED
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

RT U O

Ma ____ ____ Dated:____rch 2,_2009 _____

S tip u la tio n Seeking Order Extending Time for D e fe n d a n t United Airlines to Answer Plaintiff's A m e n d e d Complaint [Civil L.R. 7-12]; C a s e No. C 08 4528 EDL

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

2

FO

Judge E

D. La lizabeth

R NIA

DERED SO OR IT IS Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte United States Magistrate Judge porte
NO

S

RT

H