Kerner v. Mendez et al

Filing 40

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING Time for Defendant United Airlines, Inc. to Answer Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint re 38 . Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 6/17/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:08-cv-04528-EDL Document38 Filed06/15/09 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Richard G. Grotch, Esq. ­ SBN 127713 Sarvenaz J. Fahimi, Esq. ­SBN 226148 CO DDING TO N, HICKS & DANFORTH A Professional Corporation, Lawyers 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300 Redwood City, California 94065-2133 Tel. (650) 592-5400 Fax.(650) 592-5027 E-mail: rgrotch@chdlawyers.com ATTO RNEYS FOR Defendant UNITED AIR LINES, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NO RTH ERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 WHEREAS plaintiff Mary C. Kerner filed her Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") on June 18 5, 2009; and 19 WHEREAS defendant United Air Lines, Inc. (hereinafter "United") intends to move to dismiss 20 plaintiff's SAC pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and 21 WHEREAS it is in the interests of judicial economy to allow the Court to consider and rule 22 upon United's motion and plaintiff's opposition thereto, prior to the time that United files an answer, 23 if any is required; 24 / // 25 / // 26 / // 27 / // 28 S tip u la tio n Seeking Order Extending Time for D e fe n d a n t United Air Lines, Inc. to Answer Plaintiff's S e c o n d Amended Complaint - No. C 08 4528 EDL M ARY C. KERNER, Plaintiff, v s. JORGE MENDEZ, PATRICK PHILIPS, KEN SMART, UNITED AIRLINES (UAL), Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. / No. C 08 4528 EDL STIPULATION SEEKING ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT UNITED AIRLINES, INC. TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COM PLAINT [CIVIL L.R. 7-12] AND ORDER THEREON Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte Case3:08-cv-04528-EDL Document38 Filed06/15/09 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH A Professional Corp., Lawyers 5 5 5 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300 R ed w o o d City, CA 94065 (6 5 0 ) 592-5400 Plaintiff and United, through their counsel of record, respectfully stipulate, pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, that the Court enter an order extending the time within which United may answer plaintiff's SAC, if an answer is necessary, to and including, 10 days after the Court issues its ruling on United's Motion to Dismiss. SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 15, 2009 SHAPIRO & SHAPIRO /s/ Carl B. Shapiro B y: Carl B. Shapiro Attorneys for Plaintiff Mary C. Kerner Dated: June 15, 2009 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH /s/ Richard G. Grotch B y: Richard G. Grotch (*) Attorneys for Defendant United Air Lines, Inc. (*) I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 Dated: June __, 2009 S tip u la tio n Seeking Order Extending Time for D e fe n d a n t United Air Lines, Inc. to Answer Plaintiff's S e c o n d Amended Complaint - No. C 08 4528 EDL 2 ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO lizabeth Judge E D. Lapo rte R NIA _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ED Honorable ElizabethRDER D. Laporte S SO O TI U n i te d I States Magistrate Judge UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?