Rosseter v. Industrial Light and Magic
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO CONTINUE RULE 26(F) REPORT AND INITIAL DEADLINES DISCLOSURES [re 24 Stipulation filed by Industrial Light and Magic]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 12/15/2008. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2008)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THOMAS ROSSETER, Plaintiff, v. INDUSTRIAL LIGHT & MAGIC, a division of LUCAS FILM ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, LTD., a California corporation, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. / ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO CONTINUE RULE 26(F) REPORT AND INITIAL DEADLINES DISCLOSURES No. C 08-04545 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The motion to continue Rule 26(f) disclosures is DENIED because even if the case is dismissed, the parties are contemplating mediation and the disclosures will be useful no matter what. The case management conference will proceed on the same day as the motion to dismiss. The Court will, however, approve the ADR process selected by counsel.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 15, 2008.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?